Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Monitor your speed
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Start to finish · 16 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,434 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 252 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.77 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing had a mixed performance across different phases.
During the Approach Phase, the descent path was below the glideslope limit, indicating that the aircraft was descending too quickly. However, the heading alignment and speed were both excellent, suggesting good control of the aircraft. The warning to take care not to stall indicates that the aircraft may have been approaching the runway at too steep an angle or at too low a speed.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height was good, meaning the aircraft was at the correct altitude when approaching the runway. The excellent landing flare indicates a smooth transition from descent to touchdown. However, the touchdown rate was very heavy, suggesting a hard landing, which can be damaging to the aircraft and uncomfortable for passengers. The touchdown speed being on target is positive, but the heavy touchdown suggests that improvements can be made in the approach to landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position were both very good, indicating that the aircraft touched down in the correct spot on the runway. However, the heavy touchdown rate suggests that the landing was not as smooth as it could have been.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the aircraft's runway alignment was 6.3 meters from the centerline, indicating that the pilot may need to work on maintaining a straight path down the runway after touchdown.
In conclusion, while this aircraft landing had some positive elements such as excellent heading alignment, speed control, and touchdown zone accuracy, there were areas that need improvement, such as the steep descent path, heavy touchdown rate, and runway alignment during rollout. Continued practice and improvement in these areas will lead to smoother and safer landings in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values