Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Nothing to change in the speed, the height or the flare. Keep the landing attitude held until the mains are on, so the aircraft is not let down onto the runway in the last moment.
What happened: The touchdown rate was 222 fpm. Nothing before it explains that: threshold speed and height were within limits and the flare was flown normally.
Watch for: Touchdown rate: a little less than 222 fpm next time
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,250 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 343 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing Mount Pleasant Airport, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey with a smooth taxi to runway 10, taking just 3 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile. At 14°C and with a gentle tailwind of 7 kt, the aircraft lifted off the ground at 141 kt, utilizing 34% of the 881-meter runway. As it departed the Falkland Islands, the crew set a course for the mainland, navigating through a moderate crosswind of 14 kt.
The enroute climb phase saw the aircraft ascend from 1,114 ft to 38,984 ft in 39 minutes, covering 291 nautical miles. This marked the beginning of a long and efficient cruise, which lasted 86 minutes and spanned 619 nautical miles. The crew expertly managed the aircraft's altitude and airspeed, ensuring a stable and fuel-efficient flight. As the aircraft approached the coast of Argentina, the crew initiated a descent from 38,678 ft to 3,006 ft in just 23 minutes, covering 146 nautical miles. This was followed by a series of short level cruises, each lasting mere minutes, as the aircraft navigated through the Uruguayan airspace.
As the Boeing 737-600 approached its destination, Carrasco General Cesáreo L. Berisso International Airport, the crew began its final approach to runway 19 from the north. With a threshold speed of 126 kt, the aircraft touched down at 119 kt, slightly above the target speed. The touchdown distance of 339 meters was good, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The aircraft taxied to the parking area in 4 minutes, covering 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance of 1,073 nautical miles was achieved in 160 minutes, with the aircraft consuming 6,913 kg of fuel.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 19 at SUMU Carrasco General Cesáreo L. Berisso International Airport with a threshold height that met the desired standards. The aircraft's approach quality was excellent, with a heading of 179.0° from 4 nautical miles away and 1,268 feet above ground level. The threshold speed was slightly above the target at 126 knots, but the touchdown distance of 339 meters was well within acceptable limits.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was a little fast at 119 knots, but the touchdown rate of -185 feet per minute was good. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating a high degree of precision in the pilot's control of the aircraft during the final stages of the approach. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 21°C and a light wind of 4 knots from 110°, contributed to a smooth and stable approach.
The total landing distance of 779 meters, which accounted for 35% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilot's skill and control of the aircraft during the critical phases of the landing. Overall, the landing was scored at 99.8%, reflecting the high level of proficiency and precision displayed by the pilot.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values