Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,723 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,723 m of the 3,495 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,000 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing demonstrated a mix of strengths and opportunities for improvement. During the Approach Phase, it is evident that the descent path was above the glideslope limit, indicating the need for better altitude management. However, the great heading alignment and on-target speed show good piloting skills in maintaining the correct course.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the high threshold height and poor landing flare suggest the need for better judgment and technique in executing the touchdown. Improving these aspects would lead to smoother landings and reduce the risk of landing gear damage.
The Touchdown Phase showed some positive points, with the perfect touchdown rate and on-target speed indicating good control during the critical moment of contact with the runway. However, the fact that the touchdown point was considerably beyond the designated zone highlights the need for improved precision and accuracy in landing approach.
Finally, during the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 8.0 m from the centerline suggests a slight deviation from the desired path. This could potentially be addressed through better alignment techniques and a keen focus on maintaining straight-line landing.
In conclusion, while there are areas that require attention and improvement, it is commendable that certain aspects of the landing, such as speed control and overall touchdown positioning, were executed effectively. With continued practice and attention to detail, the pilot has the potential to enhance their landing performance and further elevate their skills in aircraft operations. Keep up the good work and keep striving for excellence in all aspects of your flying endeavors.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values