Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Keep the wings level on final
The one change that would have gained the most on this flight, and the guide passage for it.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,743 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,743 m of the 2,250 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 609 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Béziers-Vias Airport (LFMU), the Boeing 737-800 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. Upon reaching runway 09, the aircraft initiated its departure roll, accelerating down the 1,351-meter runway, which represented 68% of its total length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 157 knots, overcoming a headwind of 3 knots and a crosswind of 6 knots.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, ascending from 1,012 feet above sea level to 33,896 feet, a vertical gain of 32,884 feet in just 15 minutes. This phase of the flight covered a distance of 96 nautical miles. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, maintaining an altitude of 33,896 feet for 41 minutes as it traversed 311 nautical miles. The enroute descent phase commenced 1 mile south-east of Hellange, Luxembourg, where the aircraft began its gradual descent from 33,994 feet to 1,353 feet, a decrease of 32,641 feet in 29 minutes, covering 153 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached Weeze Airport (EDLV), it initiated its final approach to runway 09 from the west, aligning itself with the runway at an altitude of 1,249 feet above ground level. The landing was executed with a threshold speed well above the target, at 154 knots. Although the touchdown speed was slightly fast at 144 knots, the touchdown rate was satisfactory at -180 feet per minute. The aircraft touched down 188 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a runway touchdown position slightly misaligned by 4.6 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,658 meters, representing 74% of the runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 568 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 98 minutes and a fuel consumption of 3,789 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 09 at EDLV Weeze Airport, demonstrating a good threshold height. However, the threshold speed was above the target, registering 154 kt. The aircraft's descent and approach quality were satisfactory, with a final approach initiated from the west at 4 nm and 1,249 ft above ground level (agl), heading 93.0°.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was a little fast at 144 kt, but the touchdown rate of -180 fpm was within acceptable limits. The touchdown point was located 188 m beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. The runway touchdown position was also slightly misaligned by 4.6 m from the centreline. Local weather conditions, with a temperature of 10 °C and wind at 10 kt from 120°, contributed to a crosswind of 5 kt and a headwind of 9 kt.
The aircraft's total landing distance of 1,658 m was 74% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits. The rollout alignment was very good, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control and stabilize the aircraft after touchdown. Overall, the landing performance scored 94.1%, reflecting a high level of proficiency and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values