Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
Not the biggest loss in points — the one thing on this flight a check pilot would raise first, and the guide passage for it.
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
Side view — the last 1,705 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,705 m of the 2,248 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 293 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the landing of this aircraft can be described as somewhat mixed. The Approach Phase started off well with good heading alignment and on-target speed, but the descent path was too high above the glideslope limit. This could indicate that the pilot may have had difficulty adjusting the aircraft's vertical descent rate during the approach.
During the Landing Phase, the threshold height was slightly too low, which could have led to a harder touchdown than intended. However, there was a great landing flare, which likely helped to soften the touchdown somewhat. The touchdown rate was fair, but the speed was slightly above target, which could have contributed to a harder landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the distance was very good, indicating that the aircraft likely touched down at an appropriate point on the runway. However, the speed was again noted as being slightly above target, which could have impacted the smoothness of the landing. The runway alignment was only fair during this phase.
The Rollout Phase saw poor runway alignment, which could indicate difficulty in maintaining the aircraft centered on the runway during the rollout. This could have been due to factors such as crosswinds or the pilot's handling of the aircraft.
In conclusion, while there were some positives in the landing, such as good heading alignment and distance on touchdown, there were also areas that could be improved upon, such as managing descent path, speed control, and runway alignment. Continuous training and practice can help improve these aspects of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values