Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,809 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,809 m of the 3,027 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 363 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Tulsa International Airport, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. As it rolled down runway 18L, the aircraft accelerated to a liftoff speed of 157 knots, achieving a takeoff distance of 1,571 meters, which accounted for 51% of the runway's length. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 25°C, with a headwind of 17 knots and a crosswind of 2 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to its initial cruising altitude, it ascended from 1,658 feet above sea level to 11,247 feet, a vertical increase of 9,588 feet, in just 5 minutes and covering a distance of 26 nautical miles. The enroute climb phase was followed by a level cruise, which lasted for 13 minutes and covered 74 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another climb phase, this time from 11,254 feet to 35,469 feet, a vertical increase of 24,215 feet, in 16 minutes and covering 123 nautical miles. The flight continued with multiple level cruise phases, including a 67-minute segment that covered 580 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent, initially from 35,676 feet to 5,232 feet, a vertical decrease of 30,444 feet, in 19 minutes and covering 126 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 10 at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport was executed from the west, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 95.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,297 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown distance of 360 meters and a touchdown speed of 135 knots. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment also showed a minor deviation. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 17 minutes and covered 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 986 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 148 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 6,243 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 10 at KBWI Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport with a satisfactory approach quality, maintaining a steady descent from 1,297 feet above ground level (agl) at 4 nautical miles from the runway threshold. The aircraft's heading of 95.0° aligned well with the runway, and the threshold height was good, allowing for a smooth transition to the landing phase.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, it performed well, with a touchdown speed of 135 knots and a touchdown rate of -156 feet per minute (fpm). The touchdown distance of 360 meters was also within acceptable limits. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 8.4 meters, which would be addressed during the rollout phase. The threshold speed of 143 knots was also satisfactory, indicating a well-executed approach.
The Boeing 737-800's rollout on runway 10 was generally smooth, with a total landing distance of 1,725 meters, which accounted for 60% of the runway length. Although the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 8.4 meters, the overall performance of the aircraft was satisfactory, earning a score of 96.4%. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 22°C, did not appear to have any significant impact on the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values