Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Soften the arrival
worth +0.32 points
Arrival Touchdown scored 92.42 % — Landing Bounce at 80 % was the weak metric. Fixed, this flight scores 99.37 %.
Start to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
As close to the book as it gets.
As close to the book as it gets.
Solid — small amounts left on the table.
Stabilised approach
The approach, gate by gate
Where the wheels went down
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,512 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 153 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
0.95 points lost
Biggest loss first. Every scored stage counts equally within its phase, and the phases equally in the flight score — so each amount is exact, not an estimate.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A350-900, then departed from runway 14R at Toulouse-Blagnac Airport (LFBO) in Toulouse, France. The takeoff distance was 1,138 meters, which was 33% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 161 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 18°C and a wind speed of 16 knots from a direction of 140°. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 16 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb overhead the airport, rising from an altitude of 1,500 feet above sea level to 34,674 feet above sea level, an increase of 33,174 feet in 16 minutes and covering a distance of 93 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile north-east of Saint-Chamant, France. This phase lasted for 45 minutes and covered a distance of 347 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 1 mile west of Vielsalm, Belgium. The descent took 21 minutes and covered a distance of 69 nautical miles, during which the aircraft dropped from an altitude of 34,830 feet above sea level to 1,928 feet above sea level, a decrease of 32,902 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile south-west of Reusel, Netherlands. This phase lasted for 4 minutes and covered a distance of 7 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 03 at Eindhoven Airport (EHEH) was made from the south-west, with the aircraft heading 35.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,279 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 03 was successful, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 128 knots and a distance of 150 meters. The touchdown rate was hard at -432 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 7 knots from a direction of 50°, resulting in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 6 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,036 meters, which was 41% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 525 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 99 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 9,339 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A350-900 successfully landed at Eindhoven Airport, achieving a score of 95.5%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southwest, heading 35.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,279 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with good control, and the aircraft landed safely on runway 03, which has a length of 2,512 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, but the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 125 knots. However, this did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing. The touchdown distance was good, measuring 150 meters, which is within the acceptable range. The touchdown speed of 128 knots was slightly faster than the target speed, indicating that the aircraft may have been slightly over-controlled during the landing.
The touchdown rate was hard, measuring -432 feet per minute (fpm), which may indicate that the aircraft was not fully arrested upon touchdown. Nevertheless, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilot maintained excellent control during the final stages of the approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 7 knots from a direction of 50°. The crosswind component was minimal, at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots. These conditions were favorable for the landing, and the pilot was able to maintain good control throughout the approach.
The total landing distance was 1,036 meters, which is 41% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot was able to bring the aircraft to a stop quickly and efficiently. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the pilot maintained excellent control during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated good control and decision-making skills throughout the approach and landing phases. However, there were some minor issues with the touchdown speed and rate, which may be addressed in future training or evaluation sessions.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values