Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Hold the nose down until the speed reaches 157 kt, then rotate.
What happened: You started the rotation at 128 kt, 29 kt before the 157 kt rotation speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 157 kt at rotation
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested, rather than flying it on flat.
What happened: The nose was barely raised in the flare and little of the sink was taken out, flying the aircraft onto the runway. This pattern usually carries through to a firm touchdown with a noticeable sink rate.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smoothly reducing sink through the normal flare band, not a steady rate into the runway.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 10 stages, 9 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: centreline 3.6° off, against a 1° limit and speed 7 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 153 kt.
At the 500 ft gate: centreline 2.0° off, against a 1° limit.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,671 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 269 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.76 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
The Boeing 747-8 taxied from the parking area to runway 23L at NZAA Auckland International Airport in less than 1 minute, covering less than 1 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 23L, the aircraft accelerated over a takeoff distance of 1,093 m, representing 30 % of the runway length, and lifted off at 162 kt. Ambient conditions were 20 °C with a wind of 23 kt from 300°, including a 17 kt cross-wind component and a 15 kt head-wind component.
Climb commenced immediately after liftoff, beginning overhead NZAA and rising from 940 ft asl to 1,626 ft asl, an increase of 687 ft achieved in less than 1 minute while covering less than 1 nm.
Level cruise was established 1 mile southwest of NZAA, persisting for 6 minutes and encompassing a distance of 15 nm.
The final approach to runway 23L was executed from the east, with the aircraft aligned on a heading of 256.0° at 3 nm and 787 ft agl.
Landing on runway 23L, which measures 3,671 m, was performed with a threshold speed of 153 kt. Touchdown occurred 270 m down the runway at 146 kt, with a heavy touchdown rate of minus 694 fpm and a lateral deviation of 8.3 m from the centreline. Weather at the time was 20 °C with a wind of 17 kt from 300°, a 13 kt cross-wind component and an 11 kt head-wind component.
In total, the flight covered 20 nm, taking 7 minutes, and consumed 49,409 kg of fuel.
The Boeing 747-8 approached runway 23L at Auckland International Airport from the east on a heading of 256.0 ° while 3 nm out and 787 ft above ground level. At the 1,000 ft gate the approach was assessed as stabilised, with gear, flaps, sink rate, glideslope and centreline all within limits.
At the threshold the runway length was 3,671 m and the threshold height was reported as good. The aircraft established a good threshold speed of 153 kt and began the flare, touching down 270 m from the threshold at a speed of 146 kt. The touchdown rate was heavy at minus 694 fpm and the touchdown point was misaligned by 8.3 m from the centreline.
The landing concluded with the aircraft remaining on the runway after touchdown, the heavy sink rate and lateral offset persisting through the brief rollout phase.
The heavy touchdown rate suggests a need to refine flare technique to achieve a softer arrest, while the 8.3 m lateral deviation indicates that tighter alignment to the centreline would improve precision. Maintaining the overall good performance reflected by the 85.9 % score will benefit from these focused adjustments.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values