Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,738 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 350 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an RJ85, then departed from runway 01R at Kansas City International Airport (KMCI). The takeoff distance was 974 meters, which accounted for 34% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 133 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 3 knots at 320 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, and the headwind was also 2 knots. After departing from KMCI, the enroute climb started overhead the airport, with the aircraft ascending from 2,003 feet above sea level to 19,024 feet above sea level, an increase of 17,021 feet in 8 minutes and covering a distance of 27 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 4 miles west of Blazer Airport (69MU) in Easton, Missouri, and lasted for 7 minutes, covering a distance of 37 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent 4 miles northeast of Albany, Missouri, and descended from 18,781 feet above sea level to 2,811 feet above sea level, a decrease of 15,970 feet in 16 minutes and covering a distance of 76 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise resumed 3 miles north of Melcher-Dallas, Iowa, and lasted for 6 minutes, covering a distance of 21 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 31 at Des Moines International Airport (KDSM) was made from the southeast, with the aircraft heading 313.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,357 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 31 at KDSM was successful, with the touchdown distance being 351 meters, which was good. The touchdown speed was 101 knots, and the touchdown rate was very hard at -556 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of -3 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 8 knots at 329 degrees, with a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 7 knots.
The total landing distance was 698 meters, which accounted for 25% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 170 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 51 minutes. The aircraft used 1,300 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The aircraft in question, an RJ85, successfully landed at Des Moines International Airport (KDSM) with a score of 95.1%. The final approach was conducted from the southeast, heading 313.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,357 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing on runway 31, which has a length of 2,738 meters, the aircraft demonstrated good threshold height. However, the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 106 knots. Despite this, the touchdown distance was good at 351 meters, and the touchdown speed of 101 knots was also within acceptable limits.
One area of concern was the touchdown rate, which was very hard at -556 feet per minute (fpm). This indicates that the aircraft may have experienced a significant deceleration upon touchdown, which could potentially be a safety issue. On the other hand, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilot maintained a stable and controlled approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -3°C and a wind speed of 8 knots from 329°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 7 knots. These conditions were likely favorable for the landing, as they did not pose a significant challenge to the pilot.
The total landing distance was 698 meters, which is approximately 25% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot was able to bring the aircraft to a stop quickly and efficiently. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, suggesting that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft throughout the landing process.
Overall, the landing was successful, but the hard touchdown rate is a concern that should be addressed to ensure the safety of the aircraft and its occupants.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values