Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,255 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,255 m of the 2,956 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 910 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 81.0% indicates that there is room for improvement in various phases of the landing process.
In the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above target. This may have contributed to the challenges faced during the landing.
During the Landing Phase, the threshold height was significantly above target and the landing flare was very poor. These factors likely resulted in a less than ideal touchdown and contributed to the subsequent issues in the Touchdown Phase.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was hard and the speed was slightly above target. The touchdown point being 428 m beyond the touchdown zone and 9.3 m from the centreline further highlights the need for improvement in precision during this phase. Despite these challenges, it is encouraging to note that you managed to land with a 10 kn crosswind.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, runway alignment was 8.4 m from the centreline. This indicates the need for better control and alignment during the rollout process.
Overall, while there are areas that require improvement, your ability to successfully navigate a landing with a crosswind is commendable. With practice and continued focus on precision and technique, you can work towards achieving higher landing scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of your aircraft landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values