Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,662 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 425 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While a landing score of 70.8% may not be ideal, it's important to remember that every landing provides an opportunity for growth and improvement.
In this particular case, the Approach Phase was cited as having unstable glideslope alignment. This indicates that adjustments need to be made to ensure a smoother descent towards the runway. It is crucial to maintain proper alignment with the glideslope to ensure a safe and controlled approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's noted that the threshold height was well above target, the landing flare was very poor, and there were issues with landing heading and bank angle stability. These are all areas that can be improved through practice and attention to detail. Proper planning and execution during the landing phase can greatly enhance overall performance.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was cited as very heavy. This suggests that adjustments are needed to achieve a smoother touchdown. However, it's worth noting that speed was on target, the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was relatively close to the centerline. These are positive aspects that should be acknowledged and built upon.
Overall, while there were areas of improvement identified in the landing evaluation, it's important to view this as a learning opportunity. By focusing on the feedback provided and working on refining your technique, you can strive for better outcomes in future landings. Remember, every landing is an opportunity to enhance your skills and strive for excellence. Keep practicing and stay positive – improvement is within reach!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values