Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,783 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 456 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a short taxiing period from the parking to the runway, taking approximately 1 minute and covering less than 1 nautical mile. The Boeing 737-800 then departed from runway 10 at SCIP Mataveri Airport, Isla De Pascua, Chile. The takeoff distance was 1,074 meters, which accounted for 37% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 154 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 24 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots at 86 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 5 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, which started overhead SCIP Mataveri Airport. The climb took 43 minutes, during which the aircraft ascended from 1,271 feet above sea level to 38,659 feet above sea level, an increase of 37,388 feet. The climb covered a distance of 341 nautical miles.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 215 minutes and covered a distance of 1,848 nautical miles. The cruise phase took place at a specific location, defined by latitude -31.1248006 and longitude -104.7068461.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent, which started 30 miles west of SCNT Lieutenant Julio Gallardo Airport, Puerto Natales, Chile. The descent took 18 minutes, during which the aircraft descended from 38,652 feet above sea level to 3,180 feet above sea level, a decrease of 35,472 feet. The descent covered a distance of 116 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a brief level cruise phase, lasting 4 minutes and covering 11 nautical miles, 4 miles northwest of SCID Marco Davison Bascur Airport, Punta Arenas, Chile.
The final approach to runway 25 at SCCI President Carlos Ibañez del Campo International Airport was made from the east, heading 269.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,225 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown distance of 458 meters, which was good. However, the touchdown speed of 123 knots was a little fast, and the touchdown rate of -164 feet per minute was good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots at 270 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 0 knots and a headwind of 6 knots. The total landing distance was 799 meters, which accounted for 29% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took approximately 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 2,322 nautical miles, taking 210 minutes, and the aircraft used 12,424 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at SCCI President Carlos Ibañez del Campo International Airport, showcasing a high level of precision and control. The final approach to runway 25 from the east, heading 269.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,225 feet above ground level (agl), demonstrated a well-executed approach procedure.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 135 knots, which may have been a result of the aircraft's approach speed being slightly higher than intended. Despite this, the touchdown distance of 458 meters was within acceptable limits, demonstrating a good balance between speed and control.
The touchdown speed of 123 knots was a little fast, which may have been a result of the aircraft's approach speed being slightly higher than intended. Nevertheless, the touchdown rate of -164 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating a controlled and stable descent. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, demonstrating a high level of precision and control.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 4°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from 270°. This resulted in a crosswind of 0 knots and a headwind of 6 knots, which had a minimal impact on the landing. The total landing distance of 799 meters was 29% of the runway length, indicating a good balance between speed and control.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, demonstrating a high level of precision and control during the post-landing phase. Overall, the landing was a success, with the aircraft demonstrating a high level of precision and control throughout the approach and landing phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values