Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 8.4 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Hold the aim point and wait for the speed to bleed before raising the nose, starting the flare within the normal band instead of 60 ft.
What happened: The flare began at 60 ft, 15 ft earlier than the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: start the flare within the normal flare band
See Arrival Landing
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Start to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
At the 500 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,505 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 356 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a CRJ900, then departed from runway 28R at ULLI Pulkovo Airport in St. Petersburg, Russia. The takeoff distance was 1,704 meters, which was 50% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 160 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 22°C, with a wind speed of 4 knots at 160°. The crosswind component was 3 knots, while the tailwind component was 2 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb 1 mile northwest of ULLI Pulkovo Airport, rising from an altitude of 1,108 feet above sea level to 28,161 feet above sea level, an increase of 27,053 feet in 14 minutes. The climb covered a distance of 55 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 5 miles north of Kirishi, Leningrad Oblast, Russia. This phase lasted for 13 minutes and covered a distance of 93 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 19 miles north of Chagoda, Vologda Oblast, Russia, descending from 27,489 feet above sea level to 1,017 feet above sea level, a decrease of 26,471 feet in 18 minutes. The descent covered a distance of 86 nautical miles.
The aircraft entered another level cruise phase, this time starting 3 miles northwest of Cherepovets, Vologda Oblast, Russia. This phase lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. However, the flight was not without incident, as the aircraft was required to perform a go-around at ULWC Cherepovets, landing on runway 03 at an altitude of 747 feet above ground level.
The final approach to runway 03 at ULWC Cherepovets was made from the southwest, with a heading of 40.0° at an altitude of 874 feet above ground level. The aircraft landed on the runway, which had a length of 2,505 meters. The threshold height was slightly above the target, while the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 126 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 354 meters, with a touchdown speed of 116 knots. However, the touchdown rate was hard at -455 feet per minute.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 3.2 meters. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 19°C, with a wind speed of 3 knots at 60°. The crosswind component was 1 knot, while the headwind component was 3 knots. The total landing distance was 1,376 meters, which was 55% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 246 nautical miles, which was covered in 59 minutes. The aircraft used 1,773 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The CRJ900 aircraft successfully landed at ULWC Cherepovets, achieving a score of 95.0%. The final approach was conducted from the southwest, heading 40.0° at 3 nautical miles and 874 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on runway 03, which has a length of 2,505 meters.
The threshold height at 57 feet agl was slightly above the target, indicating a minor deviation in the aircraft's descent. However, the threshold speed of 126 knots was slightly below the target, suggesting that the aircraft may have been slightly slow during the approach. Despite this, the touchdown distance of 354 meters was considered good, and the touchdown speed of 116 knots was also within acceptable limits.
However, the touchdown rate of -455 feet per minute (fpm) was classified as hard, indicating that the aircraft may have experienced a significant deceleration upon touchdown. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a minor deviation in the aircraft's alignment during the approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 19°C and a wind speed of 3 knots at 60°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind component was 3 knots. These conditions were generally favorable for landing.
The total landing distance of 1,376 meters was 55% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was well-controlled during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score despite some minor deviations in the approach and touchdown phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values