Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 19 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 19 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 19 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,986 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 690 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took approximately 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 27 at LDPL Pula Airport, with a takeoff distance of 2,186 meters, which accounted for 74% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 168 knots, and the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 13 degrees Celsius, a wind speed of 5 knots at 274 degrees, resulting in a 1-knot crosswind and a 5-knot headwind.
As the aircraft climbed, it started enroute climb 1 mile south west of Loborika, Istria, Croatia, and reached an altitude of 9,142 meters above sea level, an increase of 8,772 meters from the initial altitude of 370 meters. This climb took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 92 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started 3 miles west of Cave del Predil, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy, and lasted for 5 minutes, covering 36 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its enroute descent 2 miles north east of Mallnitz, Kaernten, Austria, and descended from 9,037 meters to 4,266 meters above sea level, a decrease of 4,770.8 meters in 9 minutes, covering 54 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started 1 mile north west of Teisendorf, Bavaria, Germany, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 9 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent overhead Palling, Bavaria, Germany, and descended from 4,263 meters to 1,516 meters above sea level, a decrease of 2,746.3 meters in 7 minutes, covering 30 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started overhead Neufraunhofen, Bavaria, Germany, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 1 mile south west of Kirchberg, Bavaria, Germany, and descended from 1,355 meters to 856 meters above sea level, a decrease of 498.3 meters in 2 minutes, covering 5 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 26R at EDDM Munich Airport was made from the east, heading 263.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 405.0 meters above ground level. The landing on runway 26R, which had a length of 3,986 meters, was successful, with the threshold height being slightly above the target and the threshold speed being good at 141 knots. The touchdown point was 275 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 136 knots and a touchdown rate of -1.1 meters per second, which was fair.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.1 meters from the centerline, and the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of -2 degrees Celsius, a wind speed of 0 knots at 240 degrees, resulting in no crosswind or headwind. The total landing distance was 1,338 meters, which accounted for 34% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took approximately 7 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 239 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 55 minutes, with a fuel consumption of 2,251 kilograms.
The aircraft, identified as an A21N, successfully landed at EDDM Munich Airport on runway 26R. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 263.0° at an altitude of 405.0 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The aircraft's performance during the landing was evaluated, with a score of 91.4%.
The aircraft's approach speed was within the target range, with a threshold speed of 141 knots. The touchdown point was located 275 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is slightly off-target. However, the touchdown speed of 136 knots was considered good, indicating a controlled descent. The touchdown rate of -1.1 meters per second was fair, suggesting a moderate rate of descent.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of -2°C and a wind speed of 0 knots from 240°. This resulted in a crosswind and headwind of 0 knots, providing a relatively calm environment for the landing. The runway length at EDDM Munich Airport is 3,986 meters, which is more than sufficient to accommodate the aircraft's landing distance.
The total landing distance was 1,338 meters, accounting for 34% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating a controlled and efficient approach. The runway rollout alignment was very good, suggesting that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft's performance meeting most of the target criteria. However, there is room for improvement in terms of touchdown point accuracy and touchdown rate.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values