Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,239 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,239 m of the 2,534 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 869 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 81.7% indicates that there were several areas of the landing that were executed well, but there are also areas that require improvement.
Let's start with the positive aspects of your landing. The Approach Phase had excellent glideslope alignment, which shows that you were able to maintain a steady descent towards the runway. This is crucial for a safe and smooth landing. Additionally, the Landing Phase had good threshold height, indicating that you were able to judge the height above the runway accurately.
However, there are some areas that need attention. The Landing Phase had a very poor landing flare, which is important for a smooth touchdown on the runway. Work on timing your flare correctly to avoid a hard landing. Additionally, there was poor bank angle stability during landing, which can affect the stability of the aircraft on touchdown.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was good, but the speed was slightly above target. It's important to ensure that you are maintaining the correct speed for a safe landing. The touchdown point being 460 m beyond the touchdown zone is a significant distance, indicating that there may have been some issues with approach planning. The runway touchdown position being 9.9 m from the centerline also suggests a need for better alignment during the landing phase.
A crucial detail to note is that you landed with a 5 kn tailwind, which is risky and can affect the aircraft's performance during landing. It's important to always land into the wind to ensure better control and stability.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was 12.3 m from the centerline. Improving alignment during rollout will help with a smoother taxi to the terminal.
In conclusion, while there were some positive aspects to your landing, there are clear areas for improvement. Practice and focus on areas such as flare, speed control, alignment, and wind conditions to improve your future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in your aircraft handling skills. With dedication and practice, you can achieve even higher landing scores in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values