Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,308 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,308 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 589 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While the aircraft landing score of 79.3% may initially seem disappointing, it's important to recognize the areas where improvements can be made in order to achieve a higher score in the future.
In the Approach Phase, the descent path above the glideslope limit indicates the need for better precision in maintaining the correct vertical approach. Additionally, the speed being well above target suggests the need for better speed management to ensure a smoother landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height being above target and a poor landing flare indicate the need for better judgment and technique when approaching the runway. Improving these aspects will help in achieving a more accurate and smooth touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, while the touchdown rate was hard, it is positive to note that the speed was on target. However, the touchdown point being 134m beyond the touchdown zone highlights the need for better judgement in timing the touchdown. Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being 6.5m from the centerline indicates the need for better alignment during the landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 11.8m from the centerline suggests the need for improved control and precision in steering the aircraft post-landing.
Overall, while there are areas for improvement in each phase of the landing process, it's important to approach these challenges with a positive attitude and a determination to learn and grow from them. By focusing on improving decision-making, technique, and precision, you can work towards achieving a higher landing score in the future. Remember that every landing is an opportunity to refine your skills and strive for excellence. Keep up the hard work and dedication, and you'll see progress in no time.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values