Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 24 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,606 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,606 m of the 2,933 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 631 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 84.2% indicates a decent performance with room for improvement.
During the Approach Phase, the good glideslope alignment suggests that the pilot was able to maintain the correct descent angle towards the runway. This is a crucial aspect of the landing process as it ensures a smooth and controlled approach to the airport.
However, the Landing Phase highlights some areas that need work. The threshold height being well above the target could indicate that the pilot descended too early, potentially leading to a steeper descent angle and a less controlled landing. The very poor landing flare and poor bank angle stability during landing are concerning as they can lead to a rough touchdown and potential loss of control of the aircraft.
In the Touchdown Phase, the very heavy touchdown rate is a cause for concern as it can put excessive stress on the landing gear and potentially damage the aircraft. On a positive note, the speed being on target indicates that the pilot was able to maintain the correct approach speed for the landing.
The touchdown point being 219 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 10.5 m from the centreline are areas that need improvement in terms of precision and accuracy during landing. It is important for the pilot to ensure that they touch down within the designated touchdown zone and align the aircraft properly with the runway centreline to ensure a safe and smooth landing.
Overall, while the aircraft landing score of 84.2% is decent, there are clear areas for improvement in terms of threshold height, landing flare, bank angle stability, touchdown rate, touchdown point, and runway touchdown position. Encouraging additional practice and attention to detail in these areas can help improve future landing performance and ensure a safer and more controlled landing experience.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values