Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 0 ft agl.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Arrest the excessive sink rate on approach with a pitch and power adjustment to re-establish a stable glidepath before the gates.
What happened: An excessive sink rate was carried through the approach gates, and the flare then began early at 52 ft, 7.5 ft above the normal flare band. An elevated sink rate on approach usually carries into flaring early, as pilots react to the rate instead of waiting for the right height.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a stable, on-glidepath sink rate through the approach gates.
When Vr arrives, an abrupt near-full-scale pull, pitch overshoots, a push, and an oscillation through the first 200 ft. It feels like “this aircraft is twitchy” but the actual fault happened before liftoff. The pitch trace needs to show a clean ramp during liftoff.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 500 ft gate: sink rate 1,094 fpm, more than the glideslope needed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,588 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 485 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Boeing 737-800 taxied from the parking area to the runway in 7 minutes, covering approximately 1 nm.
The aircraft commenced its departure roll on runway 28 at LIME Milan Bergamo Airport / Antonio Locatelli Air Base, using a takeoff distance of 1,731 m which represented 63 % of the runway length; liftoff was achieved at 156 kt and the ambient temperature was 22 deg C.
Climb began overhead Orio al Serio in Lombardia, Italy, with the flight ascending from 1,545 ft asl to 35,982 ft asl - an increase of 34,437 ft - over 18 minutes while covering 111 nm.
Level cruise was established 1 mile west of Lana in Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy, and persisted for 104 minutes, during which 766 nm were flown.
Descent was initiated 6 miles north-east of Dronninglund in the North Denmark Region, Denmark, descending from 36,007 ft asl to 1,524 ft asl - a loss of 34,483 ft - in 21 minutes and traversing 116 nm.
The final approach to runway 36 at ENTO Sandefjord Airport, Torp was conducted from the south, on a heading of 360.0 deg at 4 nm and 1,246 ft agl.
Landing on runway 36 at ENTO Sandefjord Airport, Torp employed a runway length of 2,588 m; the threshold speed was 146 kt, touchdown occurred 72 m beyond the touchdown zone at 138 kt, and the vertical speed at touchdown was minus 20 fpm. The local temperature was 15 deg C.
The aircraft rolled out over a distance of 1,285 m, representing 50 % of the runway, with alignment maintained throughout the rollout.
Taxi-in to the parking area from the runway required 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nm.
In total, the flight covered 1,000 nm, required 155 minutes of elapsed time, and consumed 3,849 kg of fuel.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at EPKK Kraków John Paul II International Airport, achieving a score of 95.5%. The final approach to runway 25 was initiated from the east, with a heading of 258.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,258 feet above ground level.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down 123 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is slightly off-center. The touchdown speed of 140 knots was faster than the target speed, indicating a potential for a longer landing distance. However, the touchdown rate of -238 feet per minute was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft was able to slow down relatively quickly after touchdown.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.5 meters from the centerline, which may have contributed to the off-center touchdown. Despite this, the runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled descent during the rollout phase.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -2°C and a wind speed of 13 knots from a direction of 250°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 13 knots, which may have contributed to the aircraft's slightly faster touchdown speed.
The total landing distance of 1,530 meters was 66% of the available runway length, which is a relatively short landing distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating good control and stability during the rollout phase.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values