Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 24 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,441 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 906 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, an SR22, then departed from runway 04 at KAVX Catalina Airport, with a takeoff distance of 273 meters, which was 30% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 79 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 18°C temperature and a wind of 2 knots at 359°. The crosswind was 1 knot, and the headwind was also 1 knot. The enroute climb started overhead KAVX Catalina Airport, where the aircraft climbed from 1,990 feet above sea level to 3,033 feet, an increase of 1,043 feet in 1 minute, covering 2 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise then started 2 miles north-east of KAVX Catalina Airport and lasted 3 minutes, covering 10 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another enroute climb 8 miles south of Rancho Palos Verdes, where it climbed from 3,008 feet to 6,008 feet, an increase of 3,000 feet in 3 minutes, covering 9 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise then started 3 miles west of Rancho Palos Verdes and lasted 3 minutes, covering 9 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another enroute climb 10 miles west of Manhattan Beach, where it climbed from 6,535 feet to 8,104 feet, an increase of 1,569 feet in 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise then started 10 miles south-east of Malibu and lasted 20 minutes, covering 49 nautical miles. The enroute descent then started 3 miles south-east of Carpinteria, where the aircraft descended from 7,739 feet to 3,438 feet, a decrease of 4,301 feet in 5 minutes, covering 12 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise then started 1 mile east of Mission Canyon and lasted 2 minutes, covering 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another enroute climb 2 miles north-west of Mission Canyon, where it climbed from 3,718 feet to 4,887 feet, an increase of 1,168 feet in 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise then started 6 miles north-west of Mission Canyon and lasted 12 minutes, covering 29 nautical miles. The enroute descent then started 3 miles north of Los Alamos, where the aircraft descended from 4,985 feet to 2,440 feet, a decrease of 2,545 feet in 3 minutes, covering 7 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 30 at KSMX Santa Maria Public Airport was from the south-east, heading 319.0° at 3 nautical miles and 2,189 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 30 was at a speed of 103 knots, which was too high, and the touchdown point was 442 meters beyond the touchdown zone.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 19°C temperature and a wind of 12 knots at 281°. The crosswind was 7 knots, and the headwind was 10 knots. The total landing distance was 977 meters, which was 40% of the runway length. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.7 meters from the centreline, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.7 meters from the centreline.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 7 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 141 n
The aircraft in question, a SR22, successfully landed at KSMX Santa Maria Public Airport, Captain G Allan Hancock Field, but with some notable deviations from the ideal landing parameters. The final approach was initiated from the southeast, heading 319.0° at 3 nautical miles and 2,189 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on runway 30, which has a length of 2,441 meters.
However, the landing was not without its issues. The threshold height at 138 feet agl was excessively over target, indicating that the aircraft descended too slowly during the final approach. Additionally, the threshold speed was too high at 103 knots, which may have contributed to the excessive descent rate. The touchdown point was 442 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which suggests that the aircraft may have landed slightly too far down the runway.
Despite these issues, the touchdown speed of 68 knots was good, and the touchdown rate of -178 feet per minute was also within acceptable limits. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.7 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's alignment during the final approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 19°C and a wind speed of 12 knots from 281°. The crosswind component was 7 knots, while the headwind component was 10 knots. These conditions may have contributed to the slight misalignment of the runway touchdown position.
The total landing distance of 977 meters was 40% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.7 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's alignment during the rollout phase.
Overall, while the landing was not perfect, the aircraft's touchdown speed and rate were good, and the total landing distance was within acceptable limits. However, the deviations in threshold height, threshold speed, and runway touchdown position alignment suggest that the pilot may have benefited from additional training or practice to improve their landing skills.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values