Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Keep the wings level on final
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 305 m and 152 m above the runway.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,616 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 215 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 13 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an ATR 42, then departed from runway 36 at ENTO Sandefjord Airport, Torp. The takeoff distance was 417 meters, which accounted for 17% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 115 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 6 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 22 knots from a direction of 10 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 22 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, which started overhead ENTO Sandefjord Airport, Torp. The climb took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 17 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 404 meters above sea level to 4,720 meters above sea level, an increase of 4,316.3 meters.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 40 minutes and covered a distance of 155 nautical miles. This phase began 1 mile south west of Ryggebyen, located in the Viken region of Norway. The enroute descent phase started 8 miles north west of ENEE Sølenstua Airfield Engerdal, located in the Innlandet region of Norway. The descent took 12 minutes and covered a distance of 37 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 4,894 meters above sea level to 1,055 meters above sea level, a decrease of 3,838.5 meters.
The final approach to runway 31 at ENRO Røros Airport was made from the south east, with the aircraft heading 308.0 degrees at an altitude of 427.5 meters above ground level and 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 31, which had a length of 1,616 meters. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -3 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 19 knots from a direction of 330 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 19 knots.
The touchdown speed was slightly fast at 100 knots, but the touchdown distance was good at 213 meters. The touchdown rate was fair at -1.3 meters per second, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.3 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 587 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 215 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 71 minutes. The aircraft used 774 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The ATR 42 aircraft successfully landed at ENRO Røros Airport, achieving a high score of 98.2%. The final approach was conducted from the south east, heading 308.0° at an altitude of 427.5 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, indicating a stable approach.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 31, which has a length of 1,616 meters. The threshold speed was satisfactory at 105 knots, and the touchdown distance was also good at 213 meters. However, the touchdown speed of 100 knots was slightly faster than ideal, which may have contributed to a fair touchdown rate of -1.3 meters per second. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.3 meters from the centerline, which may require some adjustments in the approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -3°C and a wind speed of 19 knots from 330°. This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 19 knots, which may have affected the aircraft's approach and landing. Despite these conditions, the aircraft's landing distance of 587 meters was 36% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively, allowing the aircraft to come to a stop in a straight line. Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft's performance was satisfactory, despite some minor issues with touchdown speed and runway alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values