Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 25 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,561 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 341 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing had a score of 95.4%, which is a very impressive result. The approach phase was particularly strong, with excellent glideslope alignment and slightly below target speed. This shows good precision and control during the descent towards the runway.
During the landing phase, there were some areas for improvement. The threshold height and landing flare were good, indicating a smooth approach to the touchdown point. However, the poor landing heading and bank angle stability suggest that there may have been some difficulty in maintaining the correct orientation of the aircraft during the landing process. This is something that can be worked on through additional practice and training.
In the touchdown phase, the touchdown rate was fair and the speed was on target, which is positive. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 9.2 m from the centerline indicate good accuracy in touching down in the correct area. However, it is important to note that landing with a 7 kn tailwind is not ideal and should be avoided in future landings to ensure safety.
The rollout phase also had room for improvement, with the runway alignment being 11.3 m from the centerline. This indicates that there was some deviation from the desired path during the rollout after landing. Focusing on maintaining better alignment can help improve overall landing performance.
Overall, this landing score of 95.4% is something to be proud of and shows a high level of skill and proficiency. By addressing the areas for improvement identified in the analysis, such as maintaining better heading and bank angle stability during the landing phase and avoiding landing with a tailwind, you can continue to enhance your performance and strive for even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to practice and refine your skills to become an even more proficient pilot.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values