Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,572 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 274 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, landing aircratft score of 89.5% is definitely a solid performance, but there are still areas for improvement to ensure a flawless landing in the future.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is clear that the descent path was below the glideslope limit which could have caused some issues with the landing. Additionally, having the speed slightly below target may have affected the overall approach. However, these are areas that can easily be corrected with more practice and focus on maintaining the proper descent path and speed.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is evident that there were some challenges with the threshold height being significantly below target and a very poor landing flare. These can be tricky aspects to master, but with dedication and more practice on executing a proper landing flare, these issues can be worked on and improved upon.
On a positive note, the Touchdown Phase saw an excellent touchdown rate and the speed was on target, indicating that the pilot has good control during this phase. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone is also a strong point, showing accuracy in landing. However, the runway touchdown position being 3.0 m from the centerline could use some improvement to ensure a more precise landing.
Lastly, the Rollout Phase had a very good runway alignment, which is crucial for a smooth landing and safe taxiing after touchdown. This shows that the pilot has a good grasp on alignment during this phase.
In conclusion, while there were some areas that could use improvement, overall the landing score of 89.5% is a commendable achievement. With continued effort and focus on refining the descent path, speed control, threshold height, landing flare, and touchdown precision, the pilot can strive for even greater success in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to practice and perfect your skills to achieve a flawless landing every time.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values