Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach speed
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 29 stages, 27 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,738 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 84 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 5 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 36R at Tulsa International Airport (KTUL), with a takeoff distance of 1,374 meters, which was 45% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 155 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of KTUL, it encountered local weather conditions of 18°C temperature and winds of 14 knots at 63°. The crosswind was 12 knots, and the headwind was 7 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile north of KTUL and reached an altitude of 34,548 feet above sea level (asl) in 18 minutes, covering a distance of 94 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise, starting 5 miles east of AR91 Circle S Farms Airport in Arkansas, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 13 nautical miles. However, the aircraft soon began another climb, this time from 4 miles north of 1AR4 Foggy River Airport in Arkansas, reaching an altitude of 35,441 feet asl in 2 minutes, covering 14 nautical miles.
The aircraft continued to cruise at various altitudes and locations, including a level cruise starting 3 miles south of KGRX Green Forest Airport in Arkansas, which lasted for 37 minutes, covering 290 nautical miles. The aircraft also experienced several descents, including one from 35,244 feet asl to 33,077 feet asl in 2 minutes, covering 13 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its final descent, starting 3 miles north east of Somerville in Alabama, and reached an altitude of 12,180 feet asl in 20 minutes, covering 109 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a level cruise, starting 1 mile south of Powder Springs in Georgia, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 8 nautical miles.
The final descent began 3 miles south west of KFTY Fulton County Airport in Georgia, and the aircraft landed on runway 26R at Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport (KATL), with a runway length of 2,738 meters. The touchdown speed was 118 knots, and the touchdown distance was 82 meters. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 7.7 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 23°C temperature and winds of 6 knots at 340°. The crosswind was 6 knots, and the headwind was 2 knots. The total landing distance was 1,025 meters, which was 37% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
After landing, the aircraft taxiied to the parking area, a process that took 4 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 644 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 119 minutes. The aircraft used 3,196 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The CRJ900 aircraft successfully landed on runway 26R at KATL Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport, achieving a score of 90.5%. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 270.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,295 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, with a touchdown distance of 82 meters, which was considered good.
The touchdown speed of 118 knots was also within acceptable limits, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. However, the touchdown rate was reported as hard, with a rate of -415 feet per minute (fpm). This may indicate that the aircraft touched down slightly more aggressively than intended, which could be a point for improvement.
One notable issue during the landing was the misalignment of the runway touchdown position, which was off-centerline by 7.7 meters. This may have been due to factors such as wind or pilot error, and it is essential to address this issue to ensure more accurate landings in the future.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 23°C and a wind speed of 6 knots from 340°. The crosswind component was 6 knots, while the headwind component was 2 knots. These conditions were relatively calm, which may have contributed to the successful landing.
The total landing distance of 1,025 meters was 37% of the runway length, which is a reasonable distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was reported as very good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled roll-out after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there are areas for improvement, particularly in terms of touchdown rate and runway alignment. With further training and practice, the pilots can work to refine their skills and achieve even better scores in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values