Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 125 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 146 kt, 21 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 125 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Start to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 9,016 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 1,549 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxiing from the parking area to the runway, which took approximately 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 36 at I39 Madison, with a takeoff distance of 2,645 feet, which is 60% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 146 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 64°F and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 270°. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 0 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile north of KRGA Madison Richmond, and climbed from an altitude of 1,809 feet above sea level to 20,008 feet above sea level, an increase of 18,200 feet, in 8 minutes and covering 44 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 2 miles south of Chaplin, Kentucky, and lasted for 23 minutes, covering 180 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 2 miles northwest of Dix, Illinois, and descended from 19,404 feet above sea level to 7,522 feet above sea level, a decrease of 11,882 feet, in 5 minutes and covering 28 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 2 miles southwest of Germantown, Illinois, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 7 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another descent, starting 3 miles northeast of Mascoutah, Illinois, and descended from 7,678 feet above sea level to 5,564 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,114 feet, in 2 minutes and covering 7 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting overhead Shiloh, Illinois, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 7 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another descent, starting 2 miles south of Caseyville, Illinois, and descended from 5,002 feet above sea level to 1,843 feet above sea level, a decrease of 3,160 feet, in 3 minutes and covering 12 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 30R at KSTL St. Louis Lambert International Airport was made from the southeast, heading 302.0°, at 4 nautical miles and 1,306 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 30R, which has a length of 9,016 feet. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 105 knots.
The touchdown distance was good at 1,551 feet, and the touchdown speed was 101 knots, which was good. The touchdown rate was firm at -367 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 34 feet from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 59°F and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 270°, with a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 2 knots.
The total landing distance was 3,100 feet, which is 34% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 46 feet from the centerline. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area from the runway, which took approximately 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 290 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 52 minutes. The aircraft used 6,343 pounds of fuel during the flight.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed at KSTL St. Louis Lambert International Airport on runway 30R, achieving a score of 90.8%. The aircraft approached the runway from the southeast, heading 302.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,306 feet above ground level (agl).
The landing was executed with good threshold height, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct height as it touched down on the runway. However, the threshold speed was slightly below the target speed of 105 knots, which may have been due to the aircraft's descent rate or the pilot's decision to flare earlier than expected.
The touchdown distance of 1,551 feet was within acceptable limits, and the touchdown speed of 101 knots was also good. The touchdown rate of -367 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, indicating that the aircraft touched down with a moderate amount of force. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 34 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's approach path or a miscalculation of the runway alignment.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 59°F and a wind speed of 2 knots from 270°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, and the headwind component was 2 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft's approach.
The total landing distance of 3,100 feet was 34% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 46 feet from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's rollout or a miscalculation of the runway alignment.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there were some minor deviations from the ideal approach and landing parameters. The pilot's decision to flare earlier than expected and the slight misalignment of the runway touchdown position and rollout alignment may have contributed to these deviations. However, the aircraft's performance and the pilot's skills were sufficient to ensure a safe and successful landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values