Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the back pressure on the yoke after rotation so the pitch change is smoother and g force stays lower.
What happened: During the initial climb the average g force reached 1.3 g, a high value for that phase.
Watch for: G meter: smooth, steady value in the normal climb band
Arrival
Shallow the descent on final to re-intercept the glideslope and cross the threshold at 50 ft.
What happened: The aircraft was off the glideslope during the approach, tracking low against the required path.
Watch for: Watch the glideslope indicator and threshold height, targeting 50 ft at the threshold.
See Arrival Approach
A crosswind landing is a geometry problem. The air mass you're flying in is moving sideways across the runway, and you need your ground track down the centreline with your wheels aligned to it at the moment of contact. There are two techniques that will help, the crab and the sideslip.
Read more in Crosswind Landings in the SimStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: seven checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out. These checks are the approach's score.
At the 500 ft gate: glideslope 2.4° against the runway's 3.5°.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,637 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 539 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The FSReborn Phenom 300E Oberon Interior taxied from the parking area to runway 31L at UGTB Tbilisi International Airport, a movement that required 29 minutes and covered 3 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 31L, the aircraft accelerated through a takeoff distance of 2,114 m, representing 71 % of the runway, and achieved a liftoff speed of 125 kt. Local weather at the time was temperature 27 °C with wind 32 kt from 320°, providing a 2 kt cross-wind component and a 32 kt head-wind component.
The climb commenced overhead UGTB, climbing from 2,546 ft asl to 31,995 ft asl - an increase of 29,449 ft - in 8 minutes while traversing 32 nm.
Cruise began 7 miles north-west of Manglisi (Kvemo Kartli, Georgia) and persisted for 16 minutes, during which the aircraft covered 103 nm.
Descent was initiated 11 miles north of Ardanuc (Artvin, Turkey), descending from 32,000 ft asl to 1,877 ft asl - a loss of 30,123 ft - over 22 minutes and a distance of 107 nm.
A go-around was executed on runway 29 at LTCG Trabzon International Airport at an altitude of 537 ft agl.
The subsequent landing on runway 29 at LTCG, whose length is 2,637 m, featured a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 110 kt. Touchdown occurred 110 m beyond the touchdown zone at a speed of 100 kt, with a touchdown rate of minus 97 fpm and a runway touchdown position misaligned by 13.1 m from the centreline. Local conditions were temperature 25 °C, wind 11 kt from 319°, cross-wind 5 kt and head-wind 10 kt.
Rollout after touchdown required a total landing distance of 1,150 m, equivalent to 44 % of the runway, and the aircraft’s rollout alignment was misaligned by 17.1 m from the centreline.
In total, the flight covered 277 nm, took 63 minutes, and used -946 kg of fuel.
The final approach to runway 29 at LTCG Trabzon International Airport was flown from the north-east on a heading of 115.0° while at 0 nm and 1,746 ft agl, with ambient temperature 25 °C, wind 11 kt from 319°, a 5 kt crosswind component and a 10 kt headwind component.
At threshold the aircraft maintained a good threshold height and a good threshold speed of 110 kt.
Touchdown occurred 110 m beyond the designated touchdown zone; the aircraft was at a good touchdown speed of 100 kt and achieved an excellent touchdown rate of minus 97 fpm. Lateral alignment on touchdown was off centreline by 13.1 m, and the total landing distance measured 1,150 m, representing 44 % of the available runway.
During rollout the aircraft’s centreline tracking remained misaligned, deviating 17.1 m from the runway centreline.
To tighten the landing profile, focus on reducing the lateral offset at touchdown and maintaining centreline tracking through the rollout; correcting these deviations will further improve an already strong 91.0 % score.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values