Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: sink rate above what the glideslope needed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,088 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 274 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A320, then departed from runway 26L at Leipzig/Halle Airport (EDDP). The takeoff distance was 1,693 meters, which accounted for 47% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 163 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 14 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 20 knots from a direction of 269 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 19 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile northwest of Schkeuditz, Saxony, Germany. The climb took 21 minutes and covered a distance of 134 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 1,463 feet above sea level to 34,582 feet above sea level, an increase of 33,119 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 2 miles south of Roding, Bavaria, Germany. This phase lasted for 89 minutes and covered a distance of 785 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 11 miles northeast of Harqalah, Gouvernorat de Sousse, Tunisia. The descent took 24 minutes and covered a distance of 135 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 35,510 feet above sea level to 1,273 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,237 feet.
The final approach to runway 09 at Djerba Zarzis International Airport (DTTJ) was made from the west, with a heading of 88.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,231 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 09, which had a length of 3,088 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 136 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 277 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 132 knots. The touchdown rate was very hard at -567 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 29 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 17 knots from a direction of 340 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 16 knots and a tailwind of 5 knots. The total landing distance was 1,109 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took only 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
In total, the flight covered a distance of 1,063 nautical miles and took 148 minutes to complete. The aircraft used 5,673 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at Djerba Zarzis International Airport, achieving a score of 94.9%. The aircraft approached the runway from the west, heading 88.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,231 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed on runway 09, which has a length of 3,088 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, and the threshold speed was maintained at 136 knots, indicating a well-executed approach. The touchdown distance was also within acceptable limits at 277 meters. However, the touchdown speed of 132 knots was slightly higher than the desired speed, which may have contributed to a harder-than-ideal touchdown rate of -567 feet per minute (fpm).
Despite the slightly fast touchdown speed, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was well-aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 29°C and wind speeds of 17 knots at 340°, resulted in a crosswind of 16 knots and a tailwind of 5 knots. These conditions did not appear to significantly impact the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,109 meters was 36% of the runway length, which is within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft maintained its alignment with the runway centerline during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and control, resulting in a score of 94.9%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values