Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 1.7°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,502 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 393 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 24L at UUEE Sheremetyevo International Airport in Moscow, Russia. The takeoff distance was 1,132 meters, which accounted for 31% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 157 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of -7°C, with a wind speed of 6 knots at 290°.
As the aircraft climbed out of Sheremetyevo International Airport, it began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport and continued for 41 minutes. During this time, the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 1,584 feet above sea level to 38,619 feet above sea level, an increase of 37,035 feet. The enroute climb covered a distance of 329 nautical miles. The local weather conditions during the climb were a temperature of -7°C, with a wind speed of 6 knots at 290°, resulting in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 5 knots.
After completing the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 6 miles south east of Mokshan, Russia. This phase of the flight lasted for 178 minutes and covered a distance of 1,435 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 6 miles north west of Aibak, Afghanistan. The descent phase lasted for 21 minutes and covered a distance of 150 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 38,560 feet above sea level to 7,375 feet above sea level, a decrease of 31,186 feet.
The final approach to runway 29 at OAKB Kabul International Airport was made from the east, with a heading of 287.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,485 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 29, which had a length of 3,502 meters. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 9°C, with a wind speed of 0 knots at 357°, resulting in no crosswind or headwind.
The landing was successful, with a touchdown speed of 126 knots and a touchdown distance of 393 meters, which was 29% of the runway length. The touchdown rate was fair at -213 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, indicating a smooth and controlled landing. The total landing distance was 1,006 meters.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, which took 1 minute and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,922 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 248 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 10,906 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at OAKB Kabul International Airport, showcasing a high level of precision and control. The final approach to runway 29 was initiated from the east, with the aircraft heading 287.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,485 feet above ground level (agl). This approach was executed with a high degree of accuracy, as evident from the subsequent landing performance.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft demonstrated a good threshold height, indicating that the pilots maintained a stable and controlled descent. The threshold speed of 131 knots was also within the acceptable range, signifying that the pilots had properly managed the aircraft's speed during the final stages of the approach. The touchdown distance of 393 meters was also satisfactory, indicating that the pilots had successfully controlled the aircraft's descent and speed.
The touchdown speed of 126 knots was within the acceptable range, further emphasizing the pilots' ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing. However, the touchdown rate of -213 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, suggesting that the pilots could have maintained a more stable and controlled descent. Nevertheless, this did not significantly impact the overall landing performance.
The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilots had successfully aligned the aircraft with the runway centerline during the final stages of the approach. This is a critical aspect of landing, as it ensures that the aircraft remains on course and avoids any potential deviations from the runway centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 0 knots from 357°. This meant that there was no crosswind or headwind to contend with, making the landing even more challenging. The total landing distance of 1,006 meters, which accounted for only 29% of the runway length, was also satisfactory, indicating that the pilots had successfully controlled the aircraft's descent and speed.
Finally, the runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilots had successfully maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase of the landing. This is a critical aspect of landing, as it ensures that the aircraft remains on course and avoids any potential deviations from the runway centerline. Overall, the landing performance of the Boeing 737-800 aircraft at OAKB Kabul International Airport was highly satisfactory, with a score of 99.0%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values