Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down earlier
See Arrival Final 2
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: off the runway's 3° glideslope.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,826 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 207 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took approximately 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 27 at RJSS Sendai Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,032 meters, which accounted for 35% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 149 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 31 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 4 knots at 230 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, and the headwind was 4 knots. After departing from Sendai Airport, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport. The climb took 38 minutes and covered 241 nautical miles, with the aircraft ascending from 1,039 feet above sea level to 38,525 feet above sea level, an increase of 37,486 feet.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 62 minutes and covered 1,257 nautical miles. The cruise phase took place at a specific latitude and longitude, and the aircraft maintained a steady altitude throughout this period. After the cruise phase, the aircraft began its enroute descent, which started at a latitude of 52.061791 and a longitude of 170.281427. The descent took 13 minutes and covered 113 nautical miles, with the aircraft descending from 39,104 feet above sea level to 1,388 feet above sea level, a decrease of 37,716 feet.
The final approach to runway 02 at PATU Casco Cove Cgs was made from the south, with the aircraft heading at 21.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,334 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 02 took place at a runway length of 1,826 meters, with a good threshold height. The threshold speed was slightly above the target at 130 knots, and the touchdown distance was good at 208 meters. The touchdown speed was a little fast at 125 knots, but the touchdown rate was excellent at -87 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 13 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 4 knots at 73 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots, and the headwind was 3 knots. The total landing distance was 657 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The total flight distance was 1,617 nautical miles, and the flight took 116 minutes. The aircraft used 9,000 kilograms of fuel throughout the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at PATU Casco Cove Cgs, achieving a high score of 99.3%. The final approach to runway 02 was conducted from the south, with a heading of 21.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,334 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 130 knots, which was slightly above the target threshold speed. However, the touchdown distance of 208 meters was considered good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The touchdown speed of 125 knots was a little fast, but this did not significantly impact the overall performance of the landing.
The aircraft's touchdown rate was an excellent -87 feet per minute (fpm), demonstrating a high degree of control and precision during the landing. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 13°C and a wind speed of 4 knots from a direction of 73°. The crosswind component was 4 knots, while the headwind component was 3 knots. These conditions did not appear to have a significant impact on the landing performance.
The total landing distance of 657 meters was 36% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating good control and precision during the final approach and touchdown phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values