Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,685 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 375 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 06 at SBBE Val de Cans/Júlio Cezar Ribeiro International Airport in Belém, Brazil. The takeoff distance was 1,198 meters, which accounted for 43% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 149 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 28 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots at a direction of 60 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 2 knots and a headwind of 6 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb 2 miles northeast of the airport, rising from an altitude of 1,089 feet above sea level to 41,207 feet above sea level, an increase of 40,118 feet in 17 minutes, covering a distance of 105 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 15 miles east of SNVS Breves Airport in Breves, Brazil, and lasted for 65 minutes, covering a distance of 478 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent 6 miles southwest of SBUU Itapiranga Airport in Urucara, Brazil, descending from 41,390 feet above sea level to 1,534 feet above sea level, a decrease of 39,856 feet in 27 minutes, covering a distance of 122 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 11 at SBEG Eduardo Gomes International Airport was made from the west, heading 90 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,266 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 11, which had a length of 2,685 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was slightly below the target at 124 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 376 meters, and the touchdown speed was 120 knots, which was also good. However, the touchdown rate was fair at -249 feet per minute.
The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 7.7 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 9.2 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 29 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 1 knot at a direction of 90 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 0 knots and a headwind of 1 knot. The total landing distance was 1,401 meters, which accounted for 52% of the runway.
The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 5 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 714 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 123 minutes. The aircraft used 4,033 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at SBEG Eduardo Gomes International Airport, achieving a score of 95.7%. The final approach to runway 11 was conducted from the west, with a heading of 90.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,266 feet above ground level.
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 124 knots, which was slightly below the target threshold speed. However, the touchdown distance of 376 meters was considered good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The touchdown speed of 120 knots was also within acceptable limits, further emphasizing the pilot's skill in managing the aircraft's descent.
Despite the good touchdown speed and distance, the touchdown rate of -249 feet per minute was only fair. This suggests that the aircraft may have experienced a slight bounce or oscillation upon touchdown, which could be attributed to various factors such as wind conditions or pilot technique.
The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 7.7 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to the pilot's judgment of the runway alignment or the aircraft's navigation system. However, this misalignment did not appear to significantly impact the overall landing performance.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 29°C and a gentle wind of 1 knot from the north. The crosswind component was negligible, and the headwind component was minimal, which contributed to a relatively smooth landing.
The total landing distance of 1,401 meters was 52% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 9.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to the pilot's difficulty in maintaining alignment during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score of 95.7%. However, there were some minor issues with the touchdown rate and runway alignment, which could be addressed through further training or adjustments to the aircraft's navigation system.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values