Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,118 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,118 m of the 3,048 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 747 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, this aircraft landing had some areas that need improvement, but there were also some positive elements to build upon.
In the Approach Phase, it's important to work on maintaining a proper descent path to stay within the glideslope limits. However, it's great to hear that the heading alignment was excellent and the speed was on target. These are important factors in ensuring a safe and controlled approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's noted that the threshold height was too high and the landing flare was poor. These are areas that can be worked on to ensure a smoother and more controlled landing in the future.
During the Touchdown Phase, it's encouraging to see that the touchdown rate was fair and the speed was just slightly above target. However, landing 315 m beyond the touchdown zone and being 4.9 m from the centreline is something that can be improved upon with practice and attention to detail.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it's important to work on maintaining runway alignment closer to the centreline. Being 5.3 m off can affect the overall landing performance and safety.
Overall, this landing provides valuable feedback for improvement, but it's important to focus on the positive aspects as well. With dedication and practice, these areas can be addressed and ultimately result in smoother and more precise landings in the future. Keep up the hard work and continue to strive for excellence in your aircraft operations.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values