Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with five checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,536 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 518 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 17 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A321, then departed from runway 09 at LBSF Sofia Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,339 meters, which accounted for 37% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 156 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were characterized by a temperature of 15°C and a wind speed of 2 knots at 206 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the tailwind was 1 knot. As the aircraft took off, it began its enroute climb, which started 2 miles east of LBSF Sofia Airport. The climb took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 128 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 2,783 feet above sea level to 34,914 feet above sea level, an increase of 32,132 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 5 miles north of Z08G Lefka Lefka. This phase lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 26 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 2 miles east of Lalapasa in Turkey. The descent took 25 minutes and covered a distance of 136 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 34,955 feet above sea level to 3,524 feet above sea level, a decrease of 31,431 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 10 miles west of Cat in Turkey. This phase lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 8 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 24L at LTFJ Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport was made from the north-east, with a heading of 244.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,490 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 24L was successful, with a touchdown point 60 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 129 knots, which was good, but the touchdown rate was hard at -483 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 8.4 meters from the centreline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 22°C and a wind speed of 5 knots at 220 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 5 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,182 meters, which accounted for 33% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.3 meters from the centreline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 309 nautical miles, which was covered in 64 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,928 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A321 aircraft successfully landed at LTFJ Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen International Airport, achieving a score of 92.0%. The final approach to runway 24L was initiated from the north east, heading 244.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,490 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating that the pilots maintained a suitable altitude prior to touchdown.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 129 kt, which was within the acceptable threshold speed of 136 kt. However, the touchdown rate was reported as hard, with a descent rate of -483 fpm. This may indicate that the pilots could have applied a smoother touchdown, but it did not compromise the overall safety of the landing.
The touchdown point was located 60 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may be considered a minor deviation. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 8.4 meters from the centerline, which could be attributed to a slight deviation in the pilots' alignment during the landing roll. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 22°C and a gentle headwind of 5 kt, did not appear to significantly impact the landing.
The total landing distance of 1,182 meters was 33% of the available runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.3 meters from the centerline, which may require further attention from the pilots to maintain a more precise alignment during future landings.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score of 92.0%. While there were some minor deviations in the touchdown point and runway alignment, the pilots demonstrated good control and adherence to standard procedures, ensuring a safe and efficient landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values