Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 5,453 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,453 ft of the 10,270 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,889 ft past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 29 at KSBP San Luis County Regional Airport. The takeoff distance was 3,793 feet, which accounted for 79% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 165 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 69°F and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 309°.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, which started 1 mile northwest of KSBP San Luis County Regional Airport. The climb took 20 minutes to reach a height of 34,707 feet, an increase of 33,631 feet from the initial altitude of 1,076 feet. During this period, the aircraft covered a distance of 130 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which began 3 miles east of Lake Hughes, California. This phase lasted for 22 minutes and covered a distance of 174 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent, which began 13 miles east of L64 Desert Center, California. The descent took 29 minutes to reduce the altitude from 35,000 feet to 2,520 feet, a decrease of 32,480 feet. During this period, the aircraft covered a distance of 177 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 25R at KPHX Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport was made from the east, with a heading of 271.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,393 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 25R, which had a length of 10,270 feet. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 146 knots.
The touchdown point was 543 feet beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 140 knots. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -122 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 84°F and a wind speed of 0 knots from a direction of 358°.
The total landing distance was 5,207 feet, which accounted for 51% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 488 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 83 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 7,582 pounds of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (KPHX) on runway 25R. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 271.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,393 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, indicating a stable and controlled descent.
Upon touchdown, the threshold speed was recorded at 146 knots, which is within the acceptable range for a safe landing. However, the touchdown speed of 140 knots was slightly higher than the ideal speed, suggesting that the pilot may have been able to flare the aircraft more effectively to achieve a smoother touchdown. The touchdown rate of -122 feet per minute (fpm) was smooth, indicating a controlled and gentle touchdown.
The touchdown point was located 543 feet beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively short distance. This suggests that the pilot was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach, and the aircraft was able to touch down smoothly and on the centerline of the runway. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 84°F and a wind speed of 0 knots from 358°. This resulted in a crosswind and headwind of 0 knots, making the landing even more challenging. However, the pilot was able to navigate the aircraft safely and smoothly.
The total landing distance was 5,207 feet, which is 51% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach and touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, with a score of 98.6%. The pilot demonstrated excellent skills and control during the final approach and touchdown, and the aircraft was able to touch down smoothly and safely on the runway.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values