Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 16 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 729 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 729 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 70 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, landing a score of 92.8% is quite commendable, and it is clear that there are a few areas where improvements can be made to achieve an even higher score in the future.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly below target. To improve in this area, careful monitoring of the descent path and speed during approach can help ensure a smoother and more accurate landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is positive to see that the threshold height was good. However, there was an issue with the landing flare being very poor. Properly executing the landing flare is crucial for a smooth touchdown, so focus on this area can lead to significant improvement in overall landing performance.
In the Touchdown Phase, the heavy touchdown rate and slight deviation in speed from the target indicate the need for better control and coordination during this critical phase of the landing. Additionally, ensuring that the touchdown distance and position on the runway are within the desired parameters can also contribute to a better overall landing score.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is encouraging to see that the runway alignment was very good. This indicates good control and decision-making during the final stages of the landing, which is essential for a safe and successful touchdown.
Overall, while there are areas for improvement, achieving a landing score of 92.8% is a strong accomplishment. By focusing on the specific areas highlighted here, and continuing to work on skills and techniques, even better landing scores can be achieved in the future. Keep up the good work and strive for continuous improvement in all aspects of aircraft landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values