Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.5 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 32 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 32 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 32 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,955 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,955 m of the 3,498 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,162 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Tokyo Haneda International Airport (RJTT), the aircraft began its taxiing process from the parking area to the runway, taking approximately 8 minutes to cover a distance of 6 nautical miles. Upon reaching runway 04, the aircraft initiated its departure roll, utilizing 33% of the 2,500-meter runway to achieve liftoff at a speed of 130 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 9°C, with a gentle headwind of 6 knots at a direction of 20°.
As the aircraft climbed away from RJTT, it began its enroute climb approximately 1 mile north of the airport, rising from an initial altitude of 1,035 feet above sea level to 16,130 feet in just 4 minutes, covering a distance of 17 nautical miles. The climb phase was followed by a 23-minute enroute level cruise, during which the aircraft maintained a steady altitude and covered a distance of 145 nautical miles. The descent phase commenced 7 miles east of Toyota, Japan, and saw the aircraft descend from 15,369 feet to 1,259 feet in 10 minutes, covering a distance of 45 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 36 at Chubu Centrair International Airport (RJGG) was initiated from the south, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 349.0° at an altitude of 1,236 feet above ground level.
Upon landing on runway 36, the aircraft touched down 743 meters beyond the touchdown zone, at a speed of 129 knots. The touchdown rate was smooth, at -124 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 14.2 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,871 meters, accounting for 54% of the 3,498-meter runway. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking approximately 1 minute to cover a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 218 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 45 minutes and a fuel consumption of 1,019 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 36 at RJGG Chubu Centrair International Airport from the south was initiated at 4 nm and 1,236 ft above ground level, heading 349.0°. The approach quality was satisfactory, but the threshold height at 79 ft agl was significantly above the target, indicating a higher-than-desired rate of descent. This was compounded by an excessively high threshold speed of 143 kt, which may have contributed to the subsequent touchdown characteristics.
The aircraft touched down 743 m beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 129 kt, which was too fast. However, the touchdown rate was smooth at -124 fpm, indicating a controlled descent. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 14.2 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 9 °C and wind at 7 kt from 220°, resulted in a crosswind of 6 kt and a tailwind of 5 kt.
The total landing distance of 1,871 m was 54% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing. However, the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 21.7 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the rollout phase. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, but with room for improvement, resulting in a score of 72.2%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values