Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down earlier
See Arrival Final 2
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 in the score
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,708 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 417 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 04 at LESO San Sebastián Airport, where the RJ85 aircraft took off with a takeoff distance of 1,014 meters, which accounted for 71% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 138 knots. At the time of departure, the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 28 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 10 knots at a direction of 9 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 8 knots.
As the aircraft climbed, it started its enroute climb overhead Hendaye, a location in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region of France. The climb took the aircraft from an altitude of 1,033 feet above sea level to 32,810 feet, an increase of 31,777 feet in just 23 minutes, covering a distance of 78 nautical miles. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which began 4 miles southwest of Cauterets, a location in the Occitanie region of France. This phase of the flight lasted for 31 minutes and covered a distance of 204 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it started its enroute descent 2 miles northeast of Grandrieu, another location in the Occitanie region of France. The descent took the aircraft from an altitude of 31,916 feet to 2,118 feet, a decrease of 29,797 feet in just 17 minutes, covering a distance of 78 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 35R at LFLL Lyon Saint-Exupéry Airport was made from the south, with the aircraft heading 356.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,314 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 35R was successful, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 102 knots and a touchdown distance of 418 meters, which accounted for 30% of the runway. The touchdown rate was fair at -283 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 25 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 14 knots at a direction of 0 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 14 knots.
Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area from the runway, taking 7 minutes to cover a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 367 nautical miles, which was covered in 84 minutes, and the aircraft used 2,878 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The aircraft in question, an RJ85, successfully landed at Lyon Saint-Exupéry Airport (LFLL) with an impressive score of 99.3%. The final approach to runway 35R was initiated from the south, with the aircraft heading 356.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,314 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. The threshold speed of 116 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing phase. The touchdown distance of 418 meters was also satisfactory, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach.
The touchdown speed of 102 knots was also within the acceptable range, suggesting that the pilot was able to manage the aircraft's speed effectively during the landing phase. However, the touchdown rate of -283 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, indicating that the aircraft may have experienced a slightly higher-than-desired rate of descent during the final stages of the approach.
Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 25°C and a wind speed of 14 knots from a direction of 0°. This resulted in a significant headwind component of 14 knots, which may have contributed to the slightly higher-than-desired touchdown rate.
The total landing distance of 812 meters was 30% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled alignment with the runway centerline during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft touching down on the runway with a good threshold height, threshold speed, and touchdown distance. While the touchdown rate was only fair, the perfect runway touchdown alignment and rollout alignment suggest that the pilot was able to maintain a stable and controlled approach and landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values