Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Apply small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during the roll.
What happened: The aircraft tracked 9.9 m off the runway centreline during the ground roll, and flights with this pattern usually carry extra bank, around 3.1°, into the first climb.
Watch for: Heading indicator: wings level, tracking the runway centreline
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,561 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 459 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight departed from LIPO Brescia Gabriele d'Annunzio Airport, where the aircraft accelerated down runway 14 and lifted off at a speed of 83 kt. The takeoff distance of 204 m was achieved with an 8% usage of the runway. Local weather conditions at the time of departure included a temperature of 14 °C, with a wind of 8 kt at 103 °, resulting in a crosswind of 4 kt and a headwind of 7 kt.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it passed over several notable locations in Italy, including Montichiari and Gussola, before entering a level cruise phase. During this phase, the aircraft maintained a steady altitude of 24,288 ft asl for 20 minutes, covering a distance of 92 nm. The climb and cruise phases were punctuated by several descent phases, during which the aircraft descended to lower altitudes before resuming level flight. The final descent phase began 2 miles south of Theoule-sur-Mer, France, and the aircraft touched down on runway 04L at LFMN Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport with a touchdown speed of 67 kt and a touchdown rate of -33 fpm.
The landing distance of 455 m was achieved with a threshold speed of 81 kt, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.4 m from the centreline. The total landing distance of 1,227 m was 48% of the runway length. The flight used 308 kg of fuel and covered a total distance of 304 nm, with a total flight time of 96 minutes. Taxiing to the parking from the runway took 8 minutes, and the aircraft covered less than 1 nm during this phase.
The aircraft touched down on runway 04L at LFMN Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport with a satisfactory approach quality, demonstrating good control and precision throughout the descent. The pilot maintained a steady heading of 45.0° from 4 nautical miles out, descending from an altitude of 1,339 feet above ground level. The threshold height was good, allowing for a smooth transition to the runway.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft exhibited good characteristics, with a speed of 67 knots and a rate of descent of -33 feet per minute. The touchdown distance of 455 meters was within acceptable limits, and the threshold speed of 81 knots was well managed. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the final stages of the approach. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 14°C and a gentle tailwind of 3 knots, contributed to a smooth and stable approach.
The rollout phase was generally satisfactory, with the aircraft coming to a stop within 1,227 meters, or 48% of the runway length. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.4 meters from the centreline, indicating a minor deviation from the desired path. Despite this, the overall performance of the pilot and the aircraft was impressive, earning a score of 96.3%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values