Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Hold the aim point and wait for the speed to bleed before raising the nose, starting the flare within the normal band instead of 92 ft.
What happened: The flare began at 92 ft, 47 ft earlier than the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: start the flare within the normal flare band
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 24 stages, 22 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,098 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,098 m of the 3,527 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 747 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-300, then departed from runway 28R at OPIS Islamabad International Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,486 meters, which accounted for 41% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 175 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 10°C temperature and a wind speed of 4 knots at 230°. The crosswind was 3 knots, and the headwind was also 3 knots. After departing from Islamabad, the enroute climb started 1 mile west of Attock, where the aircraft climbed from 2,685 feet above sea level to 33,992 feet above sea level, an increase of 31,307 feet in 15 minutes, covering a distance of 99 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise then began 9 miles southeast of Doaba, lasting 234 minutes and covering 1,751 nautical miles. The aircraft then encountered another enroute climb, this time from 34,004 feet above sea level to 35,990 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,986 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 24 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started again 22 miles east of Ercis, lasting 168 minutes and covering 1,217 nautical miles.
The aircraft then encountered another enroute climb, this time from 36,000 feet above sea level to 37,546 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,546 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 13 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started again 4 miles southeast of LZKR Hontianske Nemce Krupina, lasting 63 minutes and covering 495 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent from 38,000 feet above sea level to 3,814 feet above sea level, a decrease of 34,186 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 118 nautical miles. The enroute level cruise started again overhead Heerhugowaard, lasting 2 minutes and covering 7 nautical miles. The enroute descent then started 1 mile southwest of Zuidschermer, where the aircraft descended from 3,613 feet above sea level to 1,285 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,328 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 9 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 18R at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was made from the north, heading 183.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,285 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown point 335 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was a little fast at 140 knots, but the touchdown rate was good at -185 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.0 meters from the centerline.
The total landing distance was 2,022 meters, which accounted for 57% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft took 9 minutes to taxi to the parking, covering a distance of 3 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 3,744 nautical miles, taking 529 minutes and using 66,298 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, achieving a score of 92.0%. The final approach to runway 18R was initiated from the north, with a heading of 183.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,285 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway, with a threshold speed of 146 knots, which was considered good. However, the touchdown point was located 335 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating that the aircraft landed slightly further down the runway than intended. The touchdown speed of 140 knots was a little fast, suggesting that the pilot may have been able to flare the aircraft more effectively to achieve a smoother touchdown.
The touchdown rate of -185 feet per minute (fpm) was considered good, indicating that the aircraft was able to absorb the impact of landing smoothly. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.0 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's alignment during the final approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 3 knots from a direction of 110°. The crosswind component was 3 knots, while the headwind component was 1 knot. These conditions were relatively calm, which may have contributed to the smoothness of the landing.
The total landing distance of 2,022 meters was 57% of the available runway length, which is a relatively short distance. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot was able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase and bring it to a stop in a straight line.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score of 92.0%. However, there were some minor deviations from the intended touchdown point and speed, which may have been due to a combination of factors, including the aircraft's performance and the pilot's technique.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values