Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Start to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,984 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 314 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 06L at the PGUM Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport in Guam. The takeoff distance was 1,104 meters, which was 33% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 150 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 30°C and winds of 2 knots at 40°. The crosswind was 1 knot, and the headwind was 2 knots. After departing from Guam, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport. The climb took 40 minutes and covered a distance of 298 nautical miles, with the aircraft ascending from 1,334 feet above sea level to 37,683 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,350 feet.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 98 minutes and covered a distance of 1,086 nautical miles. The cruise phase took place at a specific location with coordinates of 18.349406° latitude and 143.6440326° longitude. After the cruise phase, the aircraft began its enroute descent, which started 13 miles east of Oarai, Japan. The descent took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 108 nautical miles, with the aircraft descending from 38,060 feet above sea level to 1,932 feet above sea level, a decrease of 36,128 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 7 nautical miles. This phase took place 10 miles southeast of RJSS Sendai Airport in Japan. After the second cruise phase, the aircraft began its final approach to runway 27 at RJSS Sendai Airport. The approach was made from the east, with the aircraft heading 264.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,285 feet above ground level.
The aircraft landed on runway 27, which had a length of 2,984 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 128 knots. The touchdown distance was 316 meters, which was good, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 121 knots. The touchdown rate was smooth at -124 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.8 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 25°C and winds of 4 knots at 180°. The crosswind was 4 knots, and the headwind was 1 knot. The total landing distance was 819 meters, which was 27% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft took 2 minutes to taxi to the parking, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,506 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 161 minutes. The aircraft used 9,091 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at RJSS Sendai Airport, achieving a high score of 99.6%. The final approach to runway 27 was conducted from the east, with a heading of 264.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,285 feet above ground level.
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 128 knots. However, the touchdown speed of 121 knots was slightly faster than ideal, which may have been due to various factors such as wind conditions or pilot judgment. The touchdown rate was smooth, with a descent rate of -124 feet per minute, indicating a controlled and stable approach.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 3.8 meters, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path or a minor error in the pilot's alignment. However, this did not appear to have a significant impact on the overall landing performance.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 25°C and a light wind of 4 knots from 180°. The crosswind component was minimal at 4 knots, and the headwind component was 1 knot, which helped to reduce the landing distance.
The total landing distance was 819 meters, which is 27% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down and stop within a reasonable distance. The runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft tracking smoothly along the centreline after touchdown.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft was able to touch down safely on the runway. While there were some minor deviations from ideal performance, the pilots were able to maintain control and execute a smooth landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values