Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 16 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,083 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,083 m of the 2,740 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 1,248 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 70.1% indicates that there were some areas of improvement in the approach, landing, and rollout phases of the landing. While there were some issues identified during the evaluation, it is important to recognize the positive aspects as well as areas for improvement.
During the Approach Phase, it was noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit and the speed was slightly above target. It is essential for pilots to maintain a stable descent path and speed to ensure a smooth and safe landing. Going forward, it would be beneficial to focus on maintaining the correct descent path and speed during the approach phase to improve overall performance.
In the Landing Phase, there were multiple areas that were highlighted for improvement. The threshold height was excessively over target, the landing flare was very poor, and there were issues with landing heading and bank angle stability. These aspects are crucial for a successful landing, and it is important to prioritize training and practice to enhance skills in these areas. By working on improving the landing flare, heading, and bank angle stability, pilots can strive for a more precise and controlled landing in future flights.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, it was noted that the touchdown rate was excellent and the speed was on target. However, the touchdown point was beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position was off-center. These findings suggest the need for increased attention to accurately positioning the aircraft for touchdown. By focusing on achieving the correct touchdown point and aligning with the runway centerline, pilots can enhance their precision and overall performance during landings.
In the Rollout Phase, it was observed that the runway alignment was off-center. Maintaining proper runway alignment is crucial for a safe rollout and taxiing after landing. By practicing correct alignment techniques and focusing on centerline guidance, pilots can improve their ability to navigate the runway accurately.
Overall, while the evaluation identified areas for improvement in the landing score, it is important to approach these findings with a positive mindset and use them as learning opportunities for growth and development. By acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses highlighted in the assessment, pilots can work towards enhancing their skills and striving for improved performance in future landings. With dedication, practice, and a focus on continuous improvement, pilots can aim for smoother, more precise landings in their flights ahead.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values