Departure
Arrival
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 04 at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport, a small airfield in the Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes region of France. The SR22 aircraft accelerated down the 182-meter runway, covering 33% of its length, before lifting off at a speed of 90 knots. The local weather conditions at the time of takeoff were characterized by a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius and a gentle wind blowing at 8 knots from a direction of 102 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 6 knots and a headwind of 4 knots.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airfield, it began its enroute climb, passing overhead Courchevel and ascending from an altitude of 6,456 feet above sea level to 6,422 feet. This increase in altitude of 34 feet was achieved in just one minute, covering a distance of less than one nautical mile. The climb was a smooth and efficient one, setting the stage for the rest of the flight.
The final approach to runway 22 at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport was made from the north-east, with the aircraft heading 243.0 degrees and descending at a rate of 62 feet per minute. However, the pilot decided to initiate a go-around at an altitude of 0 feet above ground level, likely due to a change in the weather or a safety concern.
The landing was eventually made on runway 22, which had a length of 545 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 84 knots. The touchdown point was very long, using more than 50% of the available runway, but the touchdown speed of 63 knots was good, and the touchdown rate of 1,248 feet per minute was perfect. The runway touchdown alignment was also very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were similar to those at takeoff, with a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius and a wind blowing at 11 knots from a direction of 109 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 10 knots and a tailwind of 4 knots. The total landing distance was 473 meters, which was 87% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating a smooth and controlled descent.
In total, the flight covered a distance of 2 nautical miles and used 1 kilogram of fuel. The flight was a testament to the efficiency and maneuverability of the SR22 aircraft, as well as the skill and experience of the pilot.
Replay this flight in 3D — the full flight path over the terrain with every stage, event and score along the route.
Departure Roll
95.08 %
Departure roll runway 04 at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport. Takeoff distance 182 m 33 % of runway. Liftoff speed was 90 kt. Local weather - Temperature 2 °C. Wind 8 kt at 102 °. Crosswind: 6 kt Headwind: 4 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Takeoff distance 182 m 33 % of runway |
|||
| 77.91 % |
Liftoff speed was 90 kt Target 75 kt |
|||
| 97.51 % |
Runway alignment max 6.19 m 2.46 m left to 3.73 m right |
-3.73 | -1.72 m | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.06 g 0.98 g min to max 1.22 g |
0.98 | 1.22 g | |
| 100 % |
Takeoff Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average pitch angle -9.6 ° -11.3 ° min to max -4.8 ° |
-11.1 | -4.8 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.6 ° 0.0 ° min to max 2.2 ° |
0.2 | 2.2 ° | |
| Info |
Battery Master On at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Engine 1 Started at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Lights Switched On at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Navigation Lights Switched On at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Strobe Lights Switched On at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Heading Hold Activated at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Altitude Hold Activated at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Flight Director Activated at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Landing Gear Down at 04:38:01 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 04:38:01 |
Departure Climb 1
98.45 %
Departure climb to 50 ft agl from runway 04 LFLJ Courchevel Altiport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.4 ° 0.2 ° min to max 0.6 ° |
0.2 | 0.6 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 95 kt 90 kt min to max 98 kt |
90 | 98 kt | |
| 94.5 % |
Average bank angle 2.9 ° 0.1 ° min to max 4.1 ° |
2.6 | 0.5 ° | |
| 98.29 % |
Average g force 1.32 g 1.02 g min to max 1.56 g |
1.23 | 1.02 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -375 fpm -826 fpm min to max 22 fpm |
-826 | 22 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude -14 ft agl -17 ft agl min to max -6 ft agl |
-6 | -12 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.1 ° -4.5 ° min to max 3.7 ° |
-4.5 | 1.6 ° |
Departure Climb 2
87.86 %
Departure climb to 400 ft agl from 04 LFLJ Courchevel Altiport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation 0.8 ° 0.7 ° min to max 0.9 ° |
0.7 | 0.9 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 99 kt 98 kt min to max 104 kt |
98 | 104 kt | |
| 51.45 % |
Average bank angle 3.3 ° 0.8 ° min to max 20.4 ° |
0.8 | 20.4 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.99 g 0.91 g min to max 1.04 g |
1.00 | 0.91 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI 172 fpm 43 fpm min to max 415 fpm |
43 | 415 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude -7 ft agl -11 ft agl min to max 9 ft agl |
-11 | 9 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.9 ° 0.7 ° min to max 2.3 ° |
1.6 | 0.7 ° | |
| Info |
Flaps Fully Retracted at 04:38:09 |
|||
| Info |
Autopilot Yaw Damper Activated at 04:38:10 |
Departure Climb 3
71.54 %
Departure climb to 1,000 ft agl from 04 LFLJ Courchevel Altiport.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Heading variation -0.2 ° -1.1 ° min to max 0.3 ° |
0.3 | -1.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 110 kt 106 kt min to max 115 kt |
106 | 115 kt | |
| 7.71 % |
Average bank angle 27.3 ° 19.5 ° min to max 37.1 ° |
24.8 | 37.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.14 g 0.99 g min to max 1.31 g |
1.16 | 1.31 g | |
| 0 % |
Landing gear up |
|||
| Info |
Average VSI 397 fpm 365 fpm min to max 437 fpm |
408 | 365 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 26 ft agl 16 ft agl min to max 35 ft agl |
16 | 35 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.7 ° 1.4 ° min to max 1.9 ° |
1.9 | 1.6 ° | |
| Info |
Gear Not Retracted at 04:38:12 |
Enroute Climb
94.43 %
Enroute climb started overhead Courchevel (Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes, France). Climbing from 6,456 ft asl to 6,422 ft asl, an increase of 34 ft in 1 minutes and covering less than 1 nm.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 115 kt 90 kt min to max 141 kt |
120 | 92 kt | |
| 86.36 % |
Average bank angle 24.7 ° 2.5 ° min to max 46.8 ° |
22.5 | 5.1 ° | |
| 98.86 % |
Average g force 1.14 g 0.75 g min to max 1.54 g |
0.94 | 1.27 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -22 fpm -1,747 fpm min to max 734 fpm |
214 | -1,157 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 6,575 ft asl 6,422 ft asl min to max 6,686 ft asl |
6,456 | 6,422 ft asl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.6 ° -13.2 ° min to max 4.5 ° |
-1.2 | -3.5 ° | |
| Info |
Turn coordination 0 0 min to max 0 |
0 | 0 | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 04:38:57 |
|||
| Info |
Flaps Position 2 at 04:39:15 |
Arrival Final 2 (GA)
91.43 %
Approaching runway 22 at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport from 2 nm to 1 nm. Descent from 0 ft agl to -276 ft agl. A decrease of 213 ft in 14 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle -2.2 ° -4.1 ° min to max -0.9 ° Target 3.0 ° |
-0.9 | -4.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 85 kt 80 kt min to max 91 kt |
91 | 80 kt | |
| 66.23 % |
Heading variation 3.3 ° 0.2 ° min to max 6.4 ° |
6.4 | 0.2 ° | |
| 74.03 % |
Average bank angle 9.1 ° 5.3 ° min to max 12.6 ° |
5.3 | 8.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.03 g 0.89 g min to max 1.30 g |
1.08 | 1.15 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -863 fpm -1,146 fpm min to max -497 fpm |
-730 | -574 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude -163 ft agl -276 ft agl min to max -62 ft agl |
-62 | -276 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle -2.6 ° -5.5 ° min to max 1.9 ° |
-3.0 | 0.5 ° |
Go-around
100 %
Go-Around runway 22 at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport at 0 ft agl.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Average speed 83 kt 75 kt min to max 87 kt |
80 | 84 kt | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 6.5 ° 0.1 ° min to max 11.4 ° |
4.3 | 8.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.95 g 0.77 g min to max 1.31 g |
1.31 | 0.89 g | |
| Info |
Average altitude -126 ft agl -278 ft agl min to max -66 ft agl |
-278 | -68 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.3 ° -2.3 ° min to max 8.0 ° |
4.4 | -0.4 ° | |
| Info |
Autopilot Yaw Damper Deactivated at 04:39:59 |
Arrival Final 1
95.28 %
Approaching runway 22 at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport from 1 nm to 0 nm. Descent from 0 ft agl to -68 ft agl. A decrease of 0 ft in 0 seconds.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Approach angle -6.4 ° -6.5 ° min to max -6.3 ° Target 3.0 ° |
-6.3 | -6.5 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average speed 85 kt 84 kt min to max 85 kt |
85 | 84 kt | |
| 76.4 % |
Heading variation 1.1 ° 1.1 ° min to max 1.1 ° |
1.1 | 1.1 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average bank angle 0.0 ° 0.0 ° min to max 0.0 ° |
0.0 | 0.0 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.95 g min to max 1.05 g |
0.95 | 1.05 g | |
| Info |
Average VSI -15 fpm -25 fpm min to max -4 fpm |
-4 | -25 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude -68 ft agl -68 ft agl min to max -68 ft agl |
-68 | -68 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.3 ° -0.1 ° min to max 0.7 ° |
-0.1 | 0.7 ° |
Arrival Landing
92.85 %
Landing on runway 22 at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport, runway length 545 m. Good threshold height. Threshold speed was slightly above target at 84 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Threshold speed was slightly above target at 84 kt. Target 80 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Target 29 ft agl |
|||
| 90.33 % |
Landing and flare profile |
|||
| 77.2 % |
Heading variation 0.9 ° 0.5 ° min to max 1.1 ° |
1.1 | 0.5 ° | |
| 79.86 % |
Average bank angle 3.2 ° 0.1 ° min to max 10.4 ° |
2.7 | 3.5 ° | |
| 91.14 % |
Average g force 1.12 g 0.65 g min to max 1.81 g |
1.09 | 1.00 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 75 kt 63 kt min to max 84 kt |
84 | 63 kt | |
| Info |
Average VSI 872 fpm -40 fpm min to max 1,528 fpm |
-32 | 1,248 fpm | |
| Info |
Average altitude 83 ft agl 34 ft agl min to max 156 ft agl |
34 | 156 ft agl | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 9.6 ° 1.0 ° min to max 17.8 ° |
1.0 | 13.8 ° |
Arrival Touchdown
91.97 %
Touchdown point was very long using more than 50% of available runway. Touchdown speed at 63 kt was good. Touchdown rate was perfect at 1,248 fpm. Runway touchdown alignment was very good. Local weather - Temperature 2 °C. Wind 11 kt at 109 °. Crosswind: 10 kt Tailwind: 4 kt.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 100 % |
Touchdown VSI was 1,248 fpm. |
|||
| 100 % |
Touchdown distance was 301 m Target 334 m |
|||
| 100 % |
Speed at touchdown 63 kt Target below 74 kt |
|||
| 100 % |
Runway alignment max 2.21 m 1.06 m left |
2.21 | 0.46 m | |
| 59.49 % |
Average bank angle 1.5 ° 0.1 ° min to max 5.8 ° |
3.5 | 5.8 ° | |
| 100 % |
Average g force 0.95 g 0.70 g min to max 1.17 g |
1.00 | 0.93 g | |
| 60 % |
Landing Bounce |
|||
| Info |
Average speed 58 kt 52 kt min to max 63 kt |
63 | 52 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 11.5 ° 4.9 ° min to max 15.5 ° |
13.8 | 4.9 ° |
Arrival Rollout
76.87 %
Total landing distance 473 m, 87 % of runway. Runway rollout alignment was very good.
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| 53.21 % |
Landing distance 473 m 87 % of runway. |
|||
| 96.67 % |
Runway alignment max 4.57 m 0.60 m left to 3.96 m right |
0.48 | -3.12 m | |
| 99.14 % |
Average g force 0.87 g 0.47 g min to max 1.09 g |
0.92 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Average speed 49 kt 36 kt min to max 60 kt |
60 | 36 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 0.5 ° -5.9 ° min to max 5.5 ° |
4.7 | -1.7 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 3.9 ° 0.0 ° min to max 9.0 ° |
5.9 | 3.3 ° |
Runway Exit
Exiting runway, average speed 9 kt
| Score | Description | Start | Profile | End |
| Info |
Average speed 26 kt 9 kt min to max 38 kt |
35 | 38 kt | |
| Info |
Average pitch angle 1.5 ° -1.3 ° min to max 13.7 ° |
-1.3 | 0.2 ° | |
| Info |
Average bank angle 0.8 ° 0.1 ° min to max 2.6 ° |
2.6 | 0.1 ° | |
| Info |
Average g force 1.00 g 0.91 g min to max 1.04 g |
0.98 | 0.99 g | |
| Info |
Flaps Position 1 at 04:40:29 |
The aircraft in question, a SR22, successfully landed at LFLJ Courchevel Altiport, a challenging airfield due to its short runway length of 545 meters. The pilot's approach to the runway 22 from the north east, heading 243.0°, was executed at a distance of 1 nautical mile and an altitude of -62 feet above ground level (agl). This indicates a precise and controlled approach, taking into account the aircraft's speed and altitude.
Upon landing, the pilot achieved a good threshold height, which is essential for a safe touchdown. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 84 kt, which may have been due to the aircraft's momentum or the pilot's decision to maintain a higher speed for a smoother touchdown. The touchdown point was located very far down the runway, utilizing more than 50% of the available runway length. This may have been a result of the pilot's attempt to maintain a safe speed and control the aircraft during the landing roll.
The touchdown speed of 63 kt was within the acceptable range, indicating a controlled descent and a good handling of the aircraft's speed. The touchdown rate of 1,248 feet per minute (fpm) was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's descent and maintain a stable approach. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, which is crucial for a safe landing and to avoid any potential damage to the aircraft.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 2°C and a wind speed of 11 kt from 109°. The crosswind component was 10 kt, while the tailwind component was 4 kt. Despite these challenging weather conditions, the pilot successfully managed the aircraft's approach and landing.
The total landing distance of 473 meters was 87% of the available runway length, which is a relatively long distance. However, this may have been necessary due to the pilot's decision to maintain a safe speed and control the aircraft during the landing roll. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the landing roll and avoided any potential deviations from the centerline.
Overall, the pilot's performance during the landing was satisfactory, considering the challenging weather conditions and the short runway length. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in terms of maintaining a target threshold speed and reducing the touchdown point to a more optimal location.
Warning: Landed with a 4 kt tailwind
Drag to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values