Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,681 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,681 m of the 2,680 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 816 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 87.7% is a commendable achievement. Let's break down the different phases of the landing to see where improvements can be made.
During the Approach Phase, it's great to see that the glideslope alignment was good and your speed was slightly below target. This indicates good planning and control leading up to the landing. In the Landing Phase, however, there were some areas that could use improvement. The threshold height being above target and a very poor landing flare suggest that adjustments in technique and timing may be needed.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, your touchdown rate was excellent and your speed was on target, which is fantastic to see. However, the touchdown point being 378 m beyond the touchdown zone is a significant distance and something to focus on for future landings.
Despite these areas for improvement, it's important to recognize the positive aspects of your landing as well. The runway touchdown position was very good, which demonstrates good alignment and control during the landing. It's also worth noting that you landed with a 3 kn tailwind, which can make landings more challenging, so your ability to manage this is commendable.
In the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 10.3 m from the centerline is a slight deviation that can be improved with practice and focus on alignment.
Overall, your landing score of 87.7% is a solid result, and with some adjustments in technique and focus on key areas like threshold height, landing flare, and touchdown point, you can continue to improve and strive for even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to practice and refine your skills for smoother and more precise landings. Well done!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values