Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 26 stages, 24 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 5,000 ft of the approach.
Plan view — the first 5,000 ft of the 5,992 ft runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 87 ft touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 2.04 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 86.2% shows that there were some areas of improvement during the landing process. However, it is important to focus on the positive aspects of the landing performance as well.
During the Approach Phase, it is noted that the glideslope alignment was unstable and the speed was slightly below target. To improve in this area, it is important to maintain a steady glideslope alignment and ensure that the speed is kept at the appropriate level for a safe landing.
In the Landing Phase, it is encouraging to see that the threshold height was good. However, there is room for improvement in the landing flare. A proper landing flare is essential for a smooth touchdown, so it would be beneficial to work on this aspect for future landings.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, it is evident that there were some areas that need attention. The touchdown rate was very heavy, which could lead to increased wear and tear on the aircraft. It is important to aim for a softer touchdown to ensure a safe and comfortable landing for all passengers. On a positive note, the speed was on target and the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone was very good. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was also noted as very good. However, it is important to avoid any bounce on touchdown, as this can lead to a rough landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, it is encouraging to see that the runway alignment was very good. Maintaining proper alignment is crucial for a safe landing and a smooth rollout on the runway.
Overall, while there were some areas for improvement identified in the landing score analysis, it is important to focus on the positive aspects as well. By working on areas such as maintaining a steady glideslope alignment, improving the landing flare, and aiming for a softer touchdown, the overall landing performance can be enhanced. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for improvement in every phase of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values