Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 2,143 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,143 m of the 4,572 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 417 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The analysis of this aircraft landing indicates a combination of positive and negative aspects throughout the various phases of the landing.
In the Approach Phase, the unstable glideslope alignment is a concerning issue as it may indicate difficulties in maintaining the correct descent path towards the runway. However, the excellent heading alignment and on-target speed are positive factors that suggest good control of the aircraft's orientation and velocity.
During the Landing Phase, the high threshold height is a potential safety concern as it may result in a longer touchdown distance and possibly a harder landing. On the other hand, the great landing flare indicates a smooth transition from descent to touchdown, which is important for ensuring a safe and comfortable landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the excellent touchdown rate and on-target speed suggest good control and coordination during the final moments before touchdown. The fact that the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone is a positive sign, as it indicates that the pilot successfully landed within the designated area of the runway. However, the deviation of 4.8 m from the centreline may suggest that there was some lateral drift during the touchdown.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment of 5.1 m from the centreline may indicate difficulty in maintaining a straight path during the rollout after landing. This lateral deviation could have various causes, such as crosswinds or mismatches in wheel alignment.
Overall, while there were some areas of concern during the landing, such as the unstable glideslope alignment and high threshold height, there were also positive elements, such as the good landing flare and on-target speeds. Continuous monitoring and improvement in these areas can help to ensure safer and more consistent landings in the future.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values