Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,614 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,614 m of the 2,977 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 588 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 77.6% shows a mixed performance across different phases of the landing process. While there were areas that need improvement, there were also some commendable aspects that deserve recognition.
During the Approach Phase, there were issues with the descent path being above the glideslope limit and the speed being slightly below target. It is important to ensure that the aircraft maintains the correct descent path and speed to ensure a smooth and safe approach to the runway. By working on these aspects, you can improve the overall quality of your landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is evident that there were significant areas for improvement. The threshold height was well above the target, indicating that adjustments need to be made in order to achieve a more precise landing. Additionally, the landing flare was described as very poor, highlighting the need for better coordination and control during this critical phase of the landing process. Practicing these aspects will help you achieve more consistent and controlled landings in the future.
Despite the challenges faced during the landing, there were positive aspects noted in the Touchdown Phase. The touchdown rate was excellent, showing good control and coordination during this critical moment. Additionally, the speed was on target, indicating that you were able to maintain the correct approach speed for a safe landing. The touchdown point being slightly beyond the designated zone and the runway touchdown position being very good are also encouraging signs of progress.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, there was room for improvement in runway alignment, as it was noted to be 18.9 meters from the centerline. Ensuring proper alignment during rollout is essential for a safe and efficient landing.
Overall, your landing score of 77.6% reflects a mix of strengths and areas for improvement. By focusing on maintaining the correct descent path, speed control, flare technique, and alignment, you can work towards achieving more consistent and precise landings. Practice, dedication, and attention to detail will help you elevate your skills and improve your overall landing performance. Keep up the hard work, and remember that every landing is an opportunity to learn and grow as a pilot. Happy flying!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values