Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 10 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,547 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 75 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, an Airbus A319, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at SKBQ Ernesto Cortissoz International Airport. This process took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The departure roll took place on runway 05, with the aircraft lifting off after a takeoff distance of 1,645 meters, which was 55% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 155 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of a temperature of 30 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 4 knots at 220 degrees. The crosswind was negligible, but there was a tailwind of 4 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Soledad, where the aircraft ascended from 1,028 feet above sea level to 37,531 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,503 feet in 18 minutes and covering a distance of 118 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began 108 miles northwest of Puerto Colombia, lasting 100 minutes and covering 718 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent 64 miles west of MYAB Clarence A. Bain Airport Mangrove Cay, where it descended from 37,164 feet above sea level to 5,691 feet above sea level, a decrease of 31,473 feet in 21 minutes and covering 129 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise, this time starting overhead Kendale Lakes and lasting only 2 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles. The enroute descent began 4 miles west of Kendall West, where the aircraft descended from 5,135 feet above sea level to 3,069 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,066 feet in 5 minutes and covering 5 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another enroute level cruise, starting 7 miles northwest of Kendall West and lasting 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles. The enroute descent began 3 miles west of Tamiami, where the aircraft descended from 2,740 feet above sea level to 1,298 feet above sea level, a decrease of 1,442 feet in 2 minutes and covering 5 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 09 at KMIA Miami International Airport took place from the west, with the aircraft heading at 87.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,274 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 09 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 75 meters and a touchdown speed of 112 knots. The touchdown rate was heavy at -804 feet per minute, but the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 8.0 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 31 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 14 knots at 100 degrees. The crosswind was 3 knots, and the headwind was 13 knots. The total landing distance was 542 meters, which was 15% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good.
The taxiing from the runway to the parking area took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 995 nautical miles, taking 165 minutes and using 5,508 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A319 aircraft successfully landed at Miami International Airport (KMIA) on runway 09, achieving a score of 90.7%. The final approach was initiated from the west, heading 87.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,274 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach speed and threshold height were well within the acceptable limits, with a threshold speed of 117 knots and a good threshold height.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's touchdown distance was also satisfactory, measuring 75 meters. The touchdown speed of 112 knots was within the acceptable range, indicating a smooth and controlled landing. However, the touchdown rate was quite heavy, at -804 feet per minute (fpm), which may indicate a slightly aggressive approach or a need for further adjustments in the aircraft's descent profile.
One notable issue during the landing was the misalignment of the runway touchdown position, which was off-centerline by 8.0 meters. This may have been due to factors such as crosswind or pilot error, and it is essential to address this issue to ensure a more precise and controlled landing.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 31°C and a wind speed of 14 knots from a direction of 100°. The crosswind component was relatively light, at 3 knots, while the headwind component was 13 knots. These conditions may have contributed to the aircraft's touchdown position being off-centerline.
The total landing distance of 542 meters was relatively short, accounting for only 15% of the runway length. This indicates that the aircraft was able to stop quickly and efficiently after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, suggesting that the pilots were able to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, while there were some minor issues during the landing, the Airbus A319 aircraft was able to achieve a satisfactory score of 90.7%. The pilots demonstrated good control and precision during the approach and landing phases, and the aircraft's performance was generally within acceptable limits.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values