Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 20 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,667 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 366 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing described in the analysis had some strengths and areas for improvement throughout the different phases of the landing process.
In the Approach Phase, the descent path was noted to be below the glideslope limit, indicating that the aircraft may have been descending too steeply. This could potentially result in a harder landing if not corrected. However, the heading alignment and speed were both on target, which are positive indicators of good piloting skills and situational awareness.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it was observed that the threshold height was slightly too low. This could suggest that the aircraft was descending too close to the runway before initiating the flare, which may have contributed to a slightly harder touchdown. However, the landing flare itself was noted to be very good, indicating that the pilot effectively reduced the rate of descent just before touchdown.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was smooth and the speed was on target, both of which are positive indicators of a well-executed landing. Additionally, the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position were both very good, suggesting that the aircraft touched down in the intended area of the runway with precision.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was noted to be 32.7 meters from the centerline. While this may not necessarily indicate an issue with the landing itself, it is important for the aircraft to maintain runway alignment for safe and efficient taxiing after touchdown.
In conclusion, while the aircraft landing had some areas for improvement such as the descent path in the Approach Phase and the threshold height in the Landing Phase, overall, the landing was executed effectively with good speed control, smooth touchdown, and precision in touchdown position. The pilot demonstrated skill and proficiency in managing various aspects of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values