Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 42 stages, 41 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,850 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 666 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 89.5% is an impressive result, especially considering the challenging aspects of the approach and landing phases. While there were some areas that could be improved upon, there were also several strengths that should be acknowledged and celebrated.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is clear that there were issues with maintaining the descent path above the glideslope limit. This is an important aspect of a successful landing, as it ensures a stable approach to the runway. I encourage you to focus on maintaining proper descent path in future landings to improve this aspect of your performance.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is noted that the threshold height was above the target and there was a very poor landing flare. Improving these areas will lead to smoother and more controlled landings. Focusing on achieving the correct threshold height and executing a proper landing flare will greatly enhance your overall landing technique.
On the other hand, the Touchdown Phase showed some positive aspects. The touchdown rate was perfect, and the speed was on target. Additionally, the touchdown point was only slightly beyond the touchdown zone, which is a good sign of precision in your landing approach. These strengths should be recognized and built upon in future landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was slightly off, with a deviation of 4.9 m from the centreline. Improving runway alignment will help with taxiing and ensure safe and efficient movement on the runway.
Overall, your landing score of 89.5% is a strong indication of your skills as a pilot. By focusing on areas of improvement in the Approach, Landing, and Rollout Phases, you can continue to enhance your performance and achieve even better scores in future landings. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in your aircraft operations. Great job!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values