Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Smooth the climb
A good takeoff has a defined shape. It also has a defined end. For an airliner that's thrust reduction and acceleration, commonly somewhere around 1,000 to 1,500 ft above the airfield depending on the operator, while for a light aircraft it's established at Vy with the flaps on schedule. Most simmers have no defined end to their takeoff, which is exactly why it never gets judged.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 14 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 912 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 912 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 265 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the TBM 850 started with a departure roll on runway 12 at EPJA Jastarnia Airfield. The takeoff distance was 335 meters, which accounted for 74% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 96 knots. The local weather at the time of departure was 15°C with a wind speed of 1 knot coming from 269°, resulting in a 1 knot crosswind and 1 knot tailwind.
Once airborne, the enroute climb began overhead Jastarnia in the Pomeranian Voivodeship, Poland. The aircraft climbed from 276 feet above sea level to 1,877 feet above sea level, gaining 1,601 feet in altitude in 2 minutes and covering a distance of 4 nautical miles.
After reaching the desired cruising altitude, the enroute level cruise commenced 3 miles southeast of Jastarnia and lasted for 9 minutes, covering a distance of 31 nautical miles.
The flight concluded with a landing on runway 10 at EPEL Elblag Airfield, which had a runway length of 912 meters. The aircraft was at a height of 43 feet above ground level at the threshold of the runway with a speed of 84 knots. The touchdown occurred 264 meters from the threshold at a speed of 78 knots, with a vertical speed indicator reading of -116 feet per minute. The local weather at the time of landing was still 15°C with a 1 knot wind coming from 269°, resulting in a negligible crosswind and a 1 knot tailwind.
The total landing distance was 534 meters, which accounted for 59% of the runway length. The entire flight covered a distance of 44 nautical miles, took 20 minutes to complete, and consumed 45 kilograms of fuel.
Firstly, congratulations on achieving a commendable aircraft landing score of 91.2%! Let's break down the analysis of each phase to understand the strengths and areas where improvement can be made.
During the Approach Phase, it is great to hear that there was excellent glideslope alignment. This indicates that the pilot effectively managed the descent path, leading to a stable approach towards the runway. Maintaining proper alignment is crucial for a safe and smooth landing, so kudos on executing this phase well.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is noted that the threshold height and landing flare were good. Setting the correct threshold height ensures the aircraft touches down at the right point on the runway, while a proper landing flare helps to reduce the descent rate and ensures a soft touchdown. These aspects are fundamental to a successful landing, and it is fantastic to see positive performance in this area.
In the Touchdown Phase, the smooth touchdown rate is a key highlight. A smooth touchdown indicates a gentle contact with the runway, which is essential for passenger comfort and aircraft maintenance. Additionally, although the speed was slightly above target, it is a minor deviation that can be easily adjusted with practice and experience. The touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone shows good precision in landing the aircraft within the designated area. Furthermore, the runway touchdown position being 15.1 meters from the centerline suggests a slight deviation in alignment that can be further improved upon in future landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 15.1 meters from the centerline indicates a consistent deviation from the ideal path. Maintaining proper alignment during rollout is essential for taxiing and ensuring safety on the runway. This aspect could be focused on during training to enhance overall landing performance.
Overall, this analysis showcases a strong landing performance with notable strengths in glideslope alignment, threshold height, landing flare, and touchdown rate. There is room for improvement in maintaining target speed, enhancing alignment during touchdown and rollout phases, and refining touchdown position on the runway. By identifying these areas and actively working on improving them, you can continue to elevate your landing skills and aim for even higher scores in the future. Keep up the good work and strive for excellence in every phase of the landing process!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values