Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
On the roll, make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline within 5.4 m.
What happened: The takeoff roll drifted off the centreline by 5.4 m, and excess bank then carried through all three climb segments. A drifted roll like this usually leads into wandering bank angle through the climb.
Watch for: Watch the heading indicator and runway centreline during the roll, and the attitude indicator for wings level through the climb.
See Departure RollDeparture Climb 1Departure Climb 2Departure Climb 3
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on final to bring speed back to 137 kt by the threshold.
What happened: The aircraft crossed the threshold at 149 kt against a target of 137 kt, and the flare that followed strayed from its usual profile; this combination usually carries through to a firm touchdown.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 137 kt at the threshold
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,835 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,835 m of the 3,282 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 618 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 29 at LQSA Sarajevo International Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,177 meters, which accounted for 59% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 164 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 7 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 12 knots at 191 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, which started 1 mile northwest of LQSA Sarajevo International Airport. The climb took 17 minutes and covered a distance of 113 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 2,629 feet above sea level to 37,720 feet above sea level, an increase of 35,090 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which began 4 miles east of Sirac, Croatia. This phase of the flight lasted for 92 minutes and covered a distance of 693 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 11 miles southeast of Loettorp, Sweden. The descent took 29 minutes and covered a distance of 152 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 38,000 feet above sea level to 1,534 feet above sea level, a decrease of 36,466 feet.
The final approach to runway 01L at ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport was made from the south, with a heading of 10.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,412 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 01L, which had a length of 3,282 meters. The threshold height at 71 feet above ground level was well above the target, and the threshold speed was also well above the target at 150 knots.
The touchdown point was 199 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 139 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -271 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of -10 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 11 knots at 30 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots, and the headwind was 11 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,751 meters, which accounted for 53% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, and the aircraft was able to taxi to the parking area in 8 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 966 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 152 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 5,427 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport, with a final approach score of 89.2%. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the south, heading 10.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,412 feet above ground level (agl). The landing was conducted on runway 01L, which has a length of 3,282 meters.
Upon reaching the threshold, the aircraft was found to be above the target height at 71 feet agl, and the threshold speed was also above the target at 150 knots. The touchdown point was located 199 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. The touchdown speed of 139 knots was slightly faster than the target, and the touchdown rate of -271 feet per minute was considered fair.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -10°C, with a wind speed of 11 knots at a direction of 30°. The crosswind component was 4 knots, while the headwind component was 11 knots. These conditions did not appear to significantly impact the landing, as the runway touchdown alignment was reported to be very good.
The total landing distance was 1,751 meters, which accounted for 53% of the runway length. This suggests that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also found to be perfect, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable and controlled descent during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft demonstrating good control and stability throughout the approach and touchdown phases. However, there were some minor deviations from the target parameters, including the touchdown speed and point.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values