Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 6.6 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Stop the rotation once the sink is arrested at 0.5 ft, holding the normal landing attitude instead of continuing to pull back.
What happened: The flare pitch reached 6.2°, well above this type's ground attitude, and touchdown followed at a sink rate of 602 fpm. Over-rotating the flare like this usually carries through to a firm or hard touchdown.
Watch for: Attitude indicator: hold the normal landing attitude once sink is arrested at 0.5 ft.
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,990 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 204 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The 1.79 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
The Airbus A320 taxied from the parking area to runway 19R at ESSA Stockholm-Arlanda Airport in 7 minutes, covering a distance of 2 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 19R, the aircraft accelerated to a liftoff speed of 161 kt and left the ground after traveling 1,885 m, which represented 57 % of the runway length; local weather reported a temperature of 27 °C, wind 14 kt from 260°, a 13 kt cross-wind component and a 5 kt head-wind component.
Climb commenced 1 mile east of Maersta, with the airplane ascending from 1,113 ft asl to 34,380 ft asl, a gain of 33,267 ft achieved in 17 minutes while covering 110 nm.
The first cruise segment began 3 miles east of Rimforsa and continued for 70 minutes, during which the aircraft flew 549 nm at level altitude.
Descent started 2 miles north of Zelezna Ruda, with the flight descending from 34,815 ft asl to 32,880 ft asl, a loss of 1,935 ft in 2 minutes over a distance of 13 nm.
A second cruise phase was initiated 2 miles east of Zachenberg, lasting 3 minutes and spanning 26 nm.
The subsequent descent began 2 miles north-west of Simbach, where the aircraft dropped from 32,560 ft asl to 3,288 ft asl, a decrease of 29,272 ft completed in 20 minutes while covering 108 nm.
For the final approach to runway 26 at LOWI Innsbruck Airport, the aircraft approached from the east on a heading of 261.0°, intercepting the glide path at 4 nm and 1,370 ft agl.
Landing on runway 26 was executed with a threshold speed of 139 kt; touchdown occurred 193 m beyond the touchdown zone at a speed of 136 kt, a vertical rate of minus 740 fpm, and a lateral deviation of 5.3 m from the centreline, under weather conditions of 28 °C, wind 1 kt from 45°, a 1 kt cross-wind and a 1 kt tail-wind component.
The runway rollout covered a total distance of 1,082 m, representing 54 % of the runway length, and alignment during rollout was reported as very good.
After exiting the runway, the aircraft taxied to the parking area in 2 minutes, traveling less than 1 nm.
In total, the flight covered 814nm, required 124 minutes of airborne time, and consumed 5,028 kg of fuel.
The Airbus A320 aircraft successfully landed on runway 25R at EBBR Brussels Airport, but with some notable deviations from the ideal landing parameters. The final approach was initiated from the north-east, heading 246.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,238 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft touched down on the runway, but the touchdown point was 404 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating a slight over-run.
The touchdown speed of 114 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -164 feet per minute (fpm) was also good. However, the threshold height at 56 feet agl was slightly above the target, and the threshold speed of 137 knots was well above the target. This suggests that the aircraft may have been slightly high and fast during the approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 26°C and a wind speed of 21 knots from 239°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 21 knots, which would have helped to reduce the landing distance. The total landing distance of 1,422 meters was 46% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll.
Despite the successful landing, there were some issues with the runway alignment. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 13.7 meters from the centerline, and the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 15.4 meters from the centerline. These deviations suggest that the aircraft may have been slightly off-center during the landing roll.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, but with some room for improvement in terms of approach parameters and runway alignment. The score of 81.5% indicates that the landing was good, but not perfect.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values